BBC vs. XBI
BBC (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF) and XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BBC tracks the LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index while XBI tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BBC returned 10.98%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for XBI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XBI.
Performance
BBC vs. XBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBC achieves a 23.79% return, which is significantly higher than XBI's 19.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BBC having a 10.98% annualized return and XBI not far ahead at 11.06%.
BBC
- 1D
- 4.97%
- 1M
- 11.76%
- YTD
- 23.79%
- 6M
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 151.23%
- 3Y*
- 26.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
XBI
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 77.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
BBC vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 23.79% | 63.77% | -1.11% | -1.80% | -35.13% | -22.31% | 30.32% | 63.81% | -18.29% | 57.85% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 19.74% | 35.89% | 1.01% | 7.60% | -25.87% | -20.45% | 48.33% | 32.56% | -15.28% | 43.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBC and XBI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BBC and XBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBC vs. XBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBC
XBI
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BBC
XBI
Basic Materials
BBC
-
XBI
Communication Services
BBC
-
XBI
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBC
-
XBI
-
Consumer Defensive
BBC
-
XBI
-
Energy
BBC
-
XBI
-
Financial Services
BBC
-
XBI
Industrials
BBC
-
XBI
-
Real Estate
BBC
-
XBI
-
Technology
BBC
-
XBI
-
Utilities
BBC
-
XBI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBC vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank
BBC
XBI
BBC vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBC | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.46 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.08 | 8.05 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.53 | 23.79 | +5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBC vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBC drawdown since its inception was -76.85%, which is greater than XBI's maximum drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBC and XBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBC | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.85% | -63.89% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.10% | -9.72% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.45% | -32.99% | -21.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.97% | -54.71% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.85% | -63.89% | -12.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.54% | -15.61% | -4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -20.93% | -16.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 3.28% | +1.86% |
Volatility
BBC vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) at 9.97%. This indicates that BBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBC | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 9.97% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.75% | 21.32% | +5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.33% | 26.52% | +9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.51% | 32.30% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.79% | 32.04% | +5.75% |
BBC vs. XBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XBI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBC vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison
BBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than XBI's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 1.37% | 1.70% | 1.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.39% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BBC and XBI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBC has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to XBI (9.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBC dropped -76.85% vs XBI's -63.89%.
On 10-year performance, XBI leads with 11.06% vs 10.98% for BBC. On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XBI has been the lower-risk option at 9.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XBI has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 10.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBC.
BBC has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.40% for XBI.
BBC tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index, while XBI tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBC and 0.35% for XBI.
BBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBC and XBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer