AMYY vs. PLTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). AMYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

AMYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -9.33% return.

AMYY

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 9.36%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 71.85%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF	7.93%	20.39%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-9.33%	46.80%

Correlation

The correlation between AMYY and PLTM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

AMYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 36
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMYY	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.24	+1.50

Drawdowns

AMYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMYY	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.91%	-42.32%	+25.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-33.02%	+33.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-18.55%	+13.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMYY	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.74%	51.40%	-25.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.74%	32.83%	-7.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.74%	30.98%	-5.24%

AMYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.55%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF	81.55%	30.28%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMYY and PLTM in my portfolio?

AMYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMYY or PLTM?

On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMYY or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMYY or PLTM?

AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 81.55%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

What is the main difference between AMYY and PLTM?

AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.50% for PLTM.