AMYY vs. NVYY
AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for NVYY.
Performance
AMYY vs. NVYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than NVYY's 1.80% return.
AMYY
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NVYY
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $385.82K | $338.43K | $371.29K | |
| $370.19K | $517.73K | $1.09M |
AMYY vs. NVYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 6.93% | 19.93% |
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 1.80% | 5.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMYY and NVYY is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMYY vs. NVYY — Risk / Return Rank
AMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVYY
AMYY vs. NVYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMYY | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMYY vs. NVYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than NVYY's maximum drawdown of -14.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and NVYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMYY | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -14.90% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -7.41% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -5.25% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.08% | — |
Volatility
AMYY vs. NVYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMYY | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.23% | 23.64% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 23.00% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 23.00% | +1.23% |
AMYY vs. NVYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVYY's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMYY vs. NVYY - Dividend Comparison
AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.27%, less than NVYY's 137.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 109.27% | 30.28% |
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 133.06% | 75.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMYY and NVYY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVYY.
NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 133.06%, compared with 109.27% for AMYY.
AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVYY is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 1.15% for NVYY.
Find the right allocation for AMYY and NVYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer