PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMYY vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMYY vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.16% return.


AMYY

1D
-0.56%
1M
-1.46%
6M
11.45%
YTD
6.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$385.82K$338.43K$371.29K
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M

AMYY vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMYY and FDL is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMYY vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMYY vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMYYFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

AMYY vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMYY vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMYYFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-65.93%

+49.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-1.96%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-9.59%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

Volatility

AMYY vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMYYFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.23%

11.95%

+12.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.23%

14.44%

+9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

17.16%

+7.07%

AMYY vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMYY vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.27%, more than FDL's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF
109.27%30.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMYY and FDL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.

AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 109.27%, compared with 3.59% for FDL.

AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.43% for FDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMYY and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer