AMYY vs. FBL
AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for FBL.
Performance
AMYY vs. FBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -32.54% return.
AMYY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FBL
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- 6M
- -32.54%
- YTD
- -32.54%
- 1Y
- -53.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 65.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $403.40K | $326.63K | $353.65K | |
| $29.15M | $35.73M | $34.36M |
AMYY vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 7.66% | 19.93% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -32.54% | -29.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMYY and FBL is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMYY vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank
AMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBL
AMYY vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMYY | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMYY vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -63.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and FBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMYY | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -63.20% | +46.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -63.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -56.28% | +53.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -18.13% | +13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 39.43% | — |
Volatility
AMYY vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMYY | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 31.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.07% | 76.91% | -52.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 72.95% | -48.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 72.95% | -48.88% |
AMYY vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMYY vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison
AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.53%, more than FBL's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 108.53% | 30.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 3.07% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMYY and FBL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FBL.
AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 108.53%, compared with 3.07% for FBL.
AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 1.09% for FBL.
Find the right allocation for AMYY and FBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer