AMT vs. SMH
AMT (American Tower Corporation) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, AMT returned 6.47%/yr vs 35.93%/yr for SMH. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMT achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 62.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AMT has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 6.47%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.93% annualized return.
AMT
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- -19.70%
- 3Y*
- -0.98%
- 5Y*
- -6.77%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
SMH
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- 6M
- 49.91%
- YTD
- 62.61%
- 1Y
- 104.33%
- 3Y*
- 55.82%
- 5Y*
- 36.02%
- 10Y*
- 35.93%
AMT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | -1.56% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 13.32% | 37.71% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 62.61% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMT and SMH is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.32 |
The correlation between AMT and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
AMT
SMH
AMT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Tower Corporation (AMT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.43 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 7.03 | -7.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 22.83 | -23.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMT drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.70% | -84.96% | -13.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.54% | -14.93% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -35.74% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.34% | -45.30% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.34% | -45.30% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.73% | -12.45% | -22.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.03% | -40.94% | +13.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.49% | 4.59% | +14.90% |
Volatility
AMT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Tower Corporation (AMT) is 9.64%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that AMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.64% | 18.45% | -8.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.04% | 31.29% | -10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.69% | 36.76% | -11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 36.19% | -9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.34% | 33.14% | -6.80% |
Dividends
AMT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
AMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 4.12% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMT and SMH have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to AMT (9.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMT dropped -98.70% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer