PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMSC vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMSC vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 98.85% return.


AMSC

1D
-3.26%
1M
-8.99%
6M
17.25%
YTD
24.95%
1Y
-8.20%
3Y*
75.08%
5Y*
17.38%
10Y*
14.23%

INSW

1D
6.63%
1M
13.42%
6M
77.43%
YTD
98.85%
1Y
149.26%
3Y*
48.58%
5Y*
51.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMSC vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
24.95%16.85%121.10%202.72%-66.18%-53.54%198.34%-29.60%207.16%-50.75%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
98.85%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AMSC and INSW is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMSC:

$1.74B

INSW:

$4.38B

EPS

AMSC:

$2.95

INSW:

$11.00

PE Ratio

AMSC:

12.17

INSW:

8.05

PEG Ratio

AMSC:

0.02

INSW:

1.27

PS Ratio

AMSC:

5.44

INSW:

6.50

PB Ratio

AMSC:

3.03

INSW:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMSC:

$299.15M

INSW:

$675.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMSC:

$91.38M

INSW:

$274.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMSC:

$19.29M

INSW:

$525.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMSC vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMSC
AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMSC vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMSCINSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.54

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

9.38

-9.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

25.88

-26.13

AMSC vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMSC Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMSC and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMSC vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMSCINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-57.49%

-42.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.08%

-16.16%

-44.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.86%

-50.40%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.94%

-50.40%

-32.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.81%

-1.67%

-93.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.80%

-20.78%

-55.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.03%

5.85%

+32.18%

Volatility

AMSC vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) at 16.78%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMSCINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.33%

16.78%

+5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.94%

29.47%

+25.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.50%

38.18%

+47.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.45%

41.38%

+46.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.28%

45.41%

+33.87%

Dividends

AMSC vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
9.41%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%

Financials

AMSC vs. INSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
86.41M
15.96M
(AMSC) Total Revenue
(INSW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AMSC and INSW have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to INSW (16.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs INSW's -57.49%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMSC and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer