AMOM vs. URNM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while URNM is a Uranium fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. AMOM is actively managed, while URNM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 11.70%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for URNM. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.

Performance

AMOM vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's 1.46% return.

AMOM

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 26.78%
• 6M: 24.27%
• 1Y: 40.35%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

URNM

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: -1.45%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: 23.19%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	26.78%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	13.08%	53.81%	3.70%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	1.46%	40.78%	-14.13%	57.80%	-11.86%	78.32%	68.36%	4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and URNM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019	0.45

AMOM vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMOM	URNM
Technology	50.2%	-
Industrials	21.9%	-
Energy	11.8%	97.7%
Healthcare	7.7%	-
Communication Services	7.4%	-
Financial Services	6.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

AMOM vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 55
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

URNM

URNM Risk / Return Rank: 17
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 18
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMOM	URNM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	0.47	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.02	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.12	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	0.63	+2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.70	1.48	+9.23

AMOM vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and URNM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMOM	URNM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.68%	-50.78%	+11.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-38.72%	+25.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	-50.78%	+20.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-50.78%	+11.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.33%	-33.69%	+29.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-18.14%	+7.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	16.54%	-12.76%

Volatility

AMOM vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is 12.24%, while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 17.96%. This indicates that AMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMOM	URNM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	17.96%	-5.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.66%	41.68%	-22.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.29%	52.32%	-28.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.26%	48.56%	-24.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.22%	47.03%	-21.81%

AMOM vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMOM vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than URNM's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.07%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	3.13%	3.18%	3.18%	3.63%	0.00%	6.70%	2.57%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMOM and URNM in my portfolio?

AMOM and URNM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMOM or URNM?

URNM has higher volatility (17.96%) compared to AMOM (12.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs URNM's -50.78%.

Which ETF is better, AMOM or URNM?

On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 15.05% vs 11.70% for AMOM. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AMOM has been the lower-risk option at 12.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMOM or URNM?

Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMOM or URNM?

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMOM or URNM?

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

What is the main difference between AMOM and URNM?

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while URNM is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.85% for URNM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.