AMOM vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMOM returned 24.84% vs 18.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

AMOM vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.01% return.

AMOM

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: -7.10%
• 6M: 12.03%
• YTD: 17.22%
• 1Y: 24.84%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 18.44%
• YTD: 19.01%
• 1Y: 18.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	17.22%	7.69%	9.91%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	19.01%	-12.98%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and RSBY is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.22

Return for Risk

AMOM vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 37
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 45

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 56
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMOM	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.62	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	2.34	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.28	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.32	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	5.39	+0.58

AMOM vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMOM	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.68%	-23.32%	-16.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-7.95%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.55%	-6.07%	-5.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.71%	-13.29%	+2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	3.41%	+0.76%

Volatility

AMOM vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 12.77% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.17%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMOM	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.77%	3.17%	+9.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.39%	8.39%	+14.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.54%	11.40%	+15.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.74%	13.34%	+11.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.45%	13.34%	+12.11%

AMOM vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMOM vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than RSBY's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.03%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.74%	2.07%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMOM and RSBY in my portfolio?

AMOM and RSBY have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMOM or RSBY?

AMOM has higher volatility (12.77%) compared to RSBY (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, AMOM or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, AMOM leads with 24.84% vs 18.35% for RSBY. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMOM or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 24.84% return vs 18.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMOM or RSBY?

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMOM or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.03% for AMOM.

What is the main difference between AMOM and RSBY?

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.