AMOM vs. QQQ
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. AMOM is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 12.57%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
AMOM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.64% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.62% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 26.64%
- 6M
- 27.60%
- 1Y
- 43.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
AMOM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 26.64% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.33% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 17.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and QQQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between AMOM and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMOM vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMOM
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
AMOM
QQQ
Industrials
AMOM
QQQ
Communication Services
AMOM
QQQ
Healthcare
AMOM
QQQ
Financial Services
AMOM
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
AMOM
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
AMOM
QQQ
Utilities
AMOM
QQQ
Basic Materials
AMOM
QQQ
Real Estate
AMOM
QQQ
Energy
AMOM
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
QQQ
AMOM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.73 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 3.55 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.47 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.71 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 14.30 | -2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.73 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.83 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.41 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -82.97% | +43.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -11.96% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -22.77% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -35.12% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -32.79% | +21.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.11% | +0.53% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 4.48% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.72% | 12.11% | +4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 15.95% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 22.39% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 22.30% | +2.66% |
AMOM vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and QQQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMOM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 18.43% vs 12.57% for AMOM. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 12.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer