AMOM vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. AMOM is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 11.70%/yr vs 15.18%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

AMOM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return.

AMOM

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 26.78%
• 6M: 24.27%
• 1Y: 40.35%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

MTUM

• 1D: -4.48%
• 1M: 8.74%
• YTD: 32.00%
• 6M: 29.92%
• 1Y: 41.78%
• 3Y*: 33.87%
• 5Y*: 15.18%
• 10Y*: 17.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	26.78%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	13.08%	53.81%	9.64%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	32.00%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and MTUM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.87

The correlation between AMOM and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMOM vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMOM	MTUM
Technology	50.2%	50.2%
Industrials	21.9%	15.0%
Energy	11.8%	10.5%
Healthcare	7.7%	3.5%
Communication Services	7.4%	5.1%
Financial Services	6.2%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.7%
Basic Materials	4.6%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.3%
Utilities	1.1%	0.6%

Return for Risk

AMOM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 55
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 64
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMOM	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.92	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.53	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.64	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.70	13.91	-3.21

AMOM vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMOM	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.68%	-34.08%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-11.54%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	-20.99%	-9.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-32.28%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.33%	-4.48%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-6.19%	-4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	3.01%	+0.77%

Volatility

AMOM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) have volatilities of 12.24% and 12.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMOM	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	12.20%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.66%	19.44%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.29%	21.93%	+2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.26%	21.15%	+3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.22%	21.31%	+3.91%

AMOM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMOM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than MTUM's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.07%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.56%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMOM and MTUM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, AMOM and MTUM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AMOM or MTUM?

AMOM has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to MTUM (12.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, AMOM or MTUM?

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.18% vs 11.70% for AMOM. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMOM or MTUM?

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMOM or MTUM?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMOM or MTUM?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

What is the main difference between AMOM and MTUM?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.15% for MTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.