AMOM vs. HTUS
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 11.70%/yr vs 14.66%/yr for HTUS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
AMOM vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 8.95% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 26.78%
- 6M
- 24.27%
- 1Y
- 40.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
AMOM vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 26.78% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.64% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 8.95% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and HTUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.66 |
The correlation between AMOM and HTUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
HTUS
AMOM vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMOM | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.79 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | 13.82 | -3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -47.50% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -8.68% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -24.41% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -24.41% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -2.67% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -4.05% | -6.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 1.75% | +2.03% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 4.02%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | 4.02% | +8.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | 10.00% | +9.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 12.04% | +12.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 19.09% | +5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 21.49% | +3.73% |
AMOM vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than HTUS's 10.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.91% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and HTUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMOM has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to HTUS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 14.66% vs 11.70% for AMOM. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer