AMOM vs. HTEC
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. AMOM is actively managed, while HTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 12.57%/yr vs -4.79%/yr for HTEC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
AMOM vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.64% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -3.60% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 26.64%
- 6M
- 27.60%
- 1Y
- 43.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.94%
- 5Y*
- -4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
AMOM vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 26.64% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 7.28% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -3.60% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 9.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and HTEC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMOM and HTEC has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AMOM vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMOM
HTEC
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
AMOM
HTEC
Industrials
AMOM
HTEC
Communication Services
AMOM
HTEC
-
Healthcare
AMOM
HTEC
Financial Services
AMOM
HTEC
Consumer Cyclical
AMOM
HTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
AMOM
HTEC
-
Utilities
AMOM
HTEC
-
Basic Materials
AMOM
HTEC
-
Real Estate
AMOM
HTEC
-
Energy
AMOM
HTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
HTEC
AMOM vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMOM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 1.33 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.00 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 1.63 | +1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 4.07 | +8.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMOM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.33 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | -0.20 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.20 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -57.53% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -16.31% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -28.67% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -56.10% | +16.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -33.69% | +33.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -28.99% | +18.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 6.54% | -2.90% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) at 5.84%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 5.84% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.72% | 14.96% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 20.31% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 24.40% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 25.47% | -0.51% |
AMOM vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than HTEC's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 1.02% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and HTEC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMOM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to HTEC (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 12.57% vs -4.79% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 12.57% return vs -4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.
HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.68% for HTEC.
AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer