PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOM vs. HTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMOM vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.64% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -3.60% return.


AMOM

1D
1.65%
1M
10.64%
YTD
26.64%
6M
27.60%
1Y
43.44%
3Y*
27.79%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*

HTEC

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.85%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
-4.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
26.64%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%13.08%53.81%7.28%
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
-3.60%23.91%2.68%-2.94%-33.72%-0.28%65.01%9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and HTEC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between AMOM and HTEC has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AMOM vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMOM
HTEC

Technology

41.9%
3.7%

Industrials

14.5%
1.3%

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Healthcare

7.7%
77.3%

Financial Services

6.2%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Utilities

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Energy

1.2%
1.2%

Technology

AMOM
41.9%
HTEC
3.7%

Industrials

AMOM
14.5%
HTEC
1.3%

Communication Services

AMOM
14.3%
HTEC

-

Healthcare

AMOM
7.7%
HTEC
77.3%

Financial Services

AMOM
6.2%
HTEC
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AMOM
5.8%
HTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

AMOM
5.0%
HTEC

-

Utilities

AMOM
3.8%
HTEC

-

Basic Materials

AMOM
2.7%
HTEC

-

Real Estate

AMOM
1.9%
HTEC

-

Energy

AMOM
1.2%
HTEC
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMOM vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

HTEC
HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMOMHTECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

1.33

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.68

2.00

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.63

+1.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.24

4.07

+8.17

AMOM vs. HTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the HTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and HTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMOMHTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.33

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

-0.20

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.20

+0.54

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and HTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMHTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-57.53%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-16.31%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.26%

-28.67%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-56.10%

+16.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-33.69%

+33.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-28.99%

+18.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

6.54%

-2.90%

Volatility

AMOM vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) at 5.84%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMOMHTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

5.84%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.72%

14.96%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

20.31%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.74%

24.40%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.96%

25.47%

-0.51%

AMOM vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMOM vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than HTEC's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.07%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
1.02%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMOM and HTEC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMOM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to HTEC (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs HTEC's -57.53%.

On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 12.57% vs -4.79% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 12.57% return vs -4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.

HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.68% for HTEC.

AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMOM and HTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer