AMOM vs. EMQQ
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. AMOM is actively managed, while EMQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 10.90%/yr vs -10.07%/yr for EMQQ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMQQ.
Performance
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 21.66% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ's -18.29% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- 6M
- 17.31%
- YTD
- 21.66%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- 6M
- -21.34%
- YTD
- -18.29%
- 1Y
- -16.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- -10.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 21.66% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.64% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -18.29% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and EMQQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AMOM and EMQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMOM
EMQQ
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
AMOM
EMQQ
Industrials
AMOM
EMQQ
Energy
AMOM
EMQQ
-
Healthcare
AMOM
EMQQ
Communication Services
AMOM
EMQQ
Financial Services
AMOM
EMQQ
Consumer Defensive
AMOM
EMQQ
Basic Materials
AMOM
EMQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMOM
EMQQ
Real Estate
AMOM
EMQQ
Utilities
AMOM
EMQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
EMQQ
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMOM | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.89 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | -0.48 | +2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.47 | -0.90 | +8.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and EMQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -73.24% | +33.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -33.70% | +20.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -33.70% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -63.59% | +23.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -56.96% | +48.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -31.59% | +20.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 17.90% | -13.85% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) at 5.50%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.54% | 5.50% | +8.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 16.94% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.18% | 20.97% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 33.06% | -8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 30.57% | -5.16% |
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than EMQQ's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.03% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.78% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMOM has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to EMQQ (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs EMQQ's -73.24%.
On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 10.90% vs -10.07% for EMQQ. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 10.90% return vs -10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.03% for AMOM.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.86% for EMQQ.
AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and EMQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer