AMOM vs. EMQQ
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. AMOM is actively managed, while EMQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 11.70%/yr vs -12.41%/yr for EMQQ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMQQ.
Performance
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ's -24.03% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 26.78%
- 6M
- 24.27%
- 1Y
- 40.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 26.78% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.64% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and EMQQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.52 |
The correlation between AMOM and EMQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMOM
EMQQ
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
AMOM
EMQQ
Industrials
AMOM
EMQQ
Energy
AMOM
EMQQ
-
Healthcare
AMOM
EMQQ
Communication Services
AMOM
EMQQ
Financial Services
AMOM
EMQQ
Consumer Defensive
AMOM
EMQQ
Basic Materials
AMOM
EMQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMOM
EMQQ
Real Estate
AMOM
EMQQ
Utilities
AMOM
EMQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
EMQQ
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMOM | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.84 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | -0.67 | +3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | -1.31 | +12.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and EMQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -73.24% | +33.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -32.55% | +19.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -32.55% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -66.31% | +26.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -59.98% | +55.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -31.47% | +20.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 16.56% | -12.78% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) at 5.99%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | 5.99% | +6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | 16.76% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 20.77% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 33.14% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 30.61% | -5.39% |
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than EMQQ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMOM has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to EMQQ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs EMQQ's -73.24%.
On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 11.70% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.86% for EMQQ.
AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and EMQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer