AMLP vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.92%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for GCOW. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

AMLP vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 6.92%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.32% annualized return.

AMLP

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 15.02%
• 3Y*: 20.22%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 6.92%

GCOW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 16.79%
• 5Y*: 12.37%
• 10Y*: 10.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	15.29%	5.78%	22.76%	21.40%	25.47%	39.09%	-32.26%	5.99%	-12.67%	-7.89%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.75%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.99%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and GCOW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between AMLP and GCOW has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AMLP vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMLP	GCOW
Energy	97.7%	22.9%
Utilities	2.3%	4.0%
Basic Materials	-	8.1%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	17.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	14.8%
Industrials	-	12.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

AMLP vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP

AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 38
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 39

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 82
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMLP	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.26	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	3.27	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.39	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	5.13	-3.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.35	13.09	-7.73

AMLP vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMLP	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.19%	-37.64%	-39.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-4.77%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-12.35%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-21.48%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.62%	-37.64%	-34.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	-2.24%	-2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.37%	-5.83%	-11.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	1.88%	+0.89%

Volatility

AMLP vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.45%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMLP	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	2.45%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.77%	7.96%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	10.85%	+0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.95%	13.49%	+6.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.67%	16.17%	+11.50%

AMLP vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMLP vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than GCOW's 4.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	7.71%	8.36%	7.70%	7.86%	7.70%	8.55%	12.31%	9.12%	9.29%	7.97%	8.09%	9.84%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.67%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMLP and GCOW in my portfolio?

AMLP and GCOW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMLP or GCOW?

AMLP has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to GCOW (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which ETF is better, AMLP or GCOW?

On 10-year performance, GCOW leads with 10.32% vs 6.92% for AMLP. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMLP or GCOW?

Over the 10-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMLP or GCOW?

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMLP or GCOW?

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 4.67% for GCOW.

What is the main difference between AMLP and GCOW?

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.60% for GCOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.