AMDY vs. QFLR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR).

AMDY and QFLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Sep 18, 2023. QFLR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jan 24, 2024.

Performance

AMDY vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMDY vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	-6.22%	53.93%	-22.50%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	-2.86%	17.27%	16.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's -2.86% return.

AMDY

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: 5.17%
• YTD: -6.22%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 65.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 2.40%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: -2.86%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 23.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDY vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

AMDY

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF

QFLR

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

Return for Risk

AMDY vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 73
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 90
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDY vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDY	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.90	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.61	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.36	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	3.03	-0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.17	13.18	-8.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDY vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDY and QFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDY	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.90	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.09	-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between AMDY and QFLR is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMDY vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 97.21%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	97.21%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMDY vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDY	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.92%	-13.97%	-39.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.59%	-7.61%	-19.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.43%	-5.40%	-15.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.00%	-2.61%	-16.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.53%	1.75%	+10.78%

Volatility

AMDY vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a higher volatility of 12.25% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) at 4.93%. This indicates that AMDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDY	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.25%	4.93%	+7.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.62%	9.48%	+31.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.23%	12.31%	+39.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.80%	12.90%	+30.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.80%	12.90%	+30.90%