PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDW vs. MAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDW vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.01% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -7.53% return.


AMDW

1D
-7.20%
1M
12.58%
YTD
176.01%
6M
174.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGY

1D
-1.25%
1M
-7.24%
YTD
-7.53%
6M
-8.15%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and MAGY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.43

AMDW vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMDW
MAGY

Technology

27.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AMDW
27.8%
MAGY

-

Basic Materials

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Communication Services

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Consumer Defensive

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Energy

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Financial Services

AMDW

-

MAGY
100.0%

Healthcare

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Industrials

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Real Estate

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Utilities

AMDW

-

MAGY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDW vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDW vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDWMAGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

AMDW vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and MAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDWMAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-14.29%

-20.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-9.54%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.25%

-2.88%

-11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

Volatility

AMDW vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDWMAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.41%

15.38%

+68.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.41%

15.45%

+67.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.41%

15.45%

+67.96%

AMDW vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDW and MAGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

AMDW vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%, less than MAGY's 40.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMDW and MAGY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW and MAGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 40.01%, compared with 37.14% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDW and MAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer