AMDL vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

AMDL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a 330.80% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

AMDL

• 1D: -11.53%
• 1M: 15.74%
• YTD: 330.80%
• 6M: 327.23%
• 1Y: 835.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	330.80%	-16.67%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and LINT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.64

AMDL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMDL	LINT
Technology	66.6%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDL	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.24	—	—

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-49.54%	-39.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.00%	-12.86%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.74%	-20.48%	-27.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.44%	168.83%	-34.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.50%	168.83%	-50.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	118.50%	168.83%	-50.33%

AMDL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDL and LINT in my portfolio?

AMDL and LINT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMDL or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDL or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDL or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between AMDL and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMDL and 0.97% for LINT.