AMDL vs. BAR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). AMDL is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. Over the past year, AMDL returned 1145.71% vs 32.54% for BAR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.

Performance

AMDL vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a 357.43% return, which is significantly higher than BAR's 4.00% return.

AMDL

• 1D: 4.30%
• 1M: 94.72%
• YTD: 357.43%
• 6M: 344.84%
• 1Y: 1,145.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -2.64%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 32.54%
• 3Y*: 31.82%
• 5Y*: 18.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	357.43%	103.00%	-69.97%
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	4.00%	64.12%	21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and BAR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.14

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

BAR

BAR Risk / Return Rank: 34
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDL	BAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	8.96	1.24	+7.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.75	1.63	+3.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.25	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	21.99	1.87	+20.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	43.27	4.71	+38.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDL vs. BAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 8.96, which is higher than the BAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and BAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDL	BAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.96	1.24	+7.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.91	-0.40

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and BAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	BAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-21.53%	-67.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-19.19%	-36.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-16.87%	+16.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.67%	-6.44%	-42.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.53%	7.64%	+20.89%

Volatility

AMDL vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 48.25% compared to GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) at 5.74%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	BAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.25%	5.74%	+42.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	93.85%	23.01%	+70.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.36%	26.52%	+102.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.58%	17.92%	+98.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.58%	16.38%	+100.20%

AMDL vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDL vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor BAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDL and BAR in my portfolio?

AMDL and BAR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDL or BAR?

AMDL has higher volatility (48.25%) compared to BAR (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs BAR's -21.53%.

Which ETF is better, AMDL or BAR?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1145.71% vs 32.54% for BAR. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDL or BAR?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1145.71% return vs 32.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDL or BAR?

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDL or BAR?

AMDL and BAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AMDL and BAR?

AMDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMDL and 0.17% for BAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.96 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.