AMDL vs. ARMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDL returned 835.61% vs 232.12% for ARMG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.

Performance

AMDL vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a 330.80% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 647.02% return.

AMDL

• 1D: -11.53%
• 1M: 15.74%
• YTD: 330.80%
• 6M: 327.23%
• 1Y: 835.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMG

• 1D: -20.34%
• 1M: 24.90%
• YTD: 647.02%
• 6M: 611.39%
• 1Y: 232.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	330.80%	117.18%
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	647.02%	-62.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and ARMG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	0.60

The correlation between AMDL and ARMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 56
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDL	ARMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.28	1.65	+4.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.08	2.61	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.33	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.04	3.43	+11.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.24	5.98	+23.26

AMDL vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 6.28, which is higher than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and ARMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	ARMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-80.28%	-8.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-68.13%	+12.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.00%	-31.86%	+18.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.74%	-51.77%	+4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.81%	39.00%	-10.19%

Volatility

AMDL vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) is 48.98%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 71.55%. This indicates that AMDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	ARMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.98%	71.55%	-22.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.19%	117.30%	-15.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.44%	141.46%	-7.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.50%	143.77%	-25.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	118.50%	143.77%	-25.27%

AMDL vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDL vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	0.65%	4.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDL and ARMG in my portfolio?

AMDL and ARMG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDL or ARMG?

ARMG has higher volatility (71.55%) compared to AMDL (48.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

Which ETF is better, AMDL or ARMG?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 835.61% vs 232.12% for ARMG. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AMDL has been the lower-risk option at 48.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDL or ARMG?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 835.61% return vs 232.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDL or ARMG?

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDL or ARMG?

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between AMDL and ARMG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMDL and 0.75% for ARMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.28 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.