AMDL vs. AMDY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AMDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDL returned 1189.78% vs 240.44% for AMDY. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AMDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

AMDL vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a 395.18% return, which is significantly higher than AMDY's 110.49% return.

AMDL

• 1D: 8.25%
• 1M: 135.69%
• YTD: 395.18%
• 6M: 371.52%
• 1Y: 1,189.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDY

• 1D: 3.39%
• 1M: 46.76%
• YTD: 110.49%
• 6M: 111.80%
• 1Y: 240.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	395.18%	103.00%	-69.97%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	110.49%	53.93%	-26.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and AMDY is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.98

The correlation between AMDL and AMDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDL	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.30	4.53	+4.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	4.54	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.64	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	21.43	8.77	+12.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.08	19.77	+22.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDL vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 9.30, which is higher than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDL	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.30	4.53	+4.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.25	-0.69

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than AMDY's maximum drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-53.92%	-34.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-27.59%	-28.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.58%	-18.02%	-30.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.53%	12.22%	+16.31%

Volatility

AMDL vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 46.02% compared to YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) at 20.81%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.02%	20.81%	+25.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	94.09%	39.99%	+54.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.41%	53.40%	+76.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.59%	46.01%	+70.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.59%	46.01%	+70.58%

AMDL vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDL vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	54.91%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDL and AMDY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, AMDL and AMDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AMDL or AMDY?

AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to AMDY (20.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

Which ETF is better, AMDL or AMDY?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1189.78% vs 240.44% for AMDY. On fees, AMDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMDY has been the lower-risk option at 20.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDL or AMDY?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1189.78% return vs 240.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDL or AMDY?

AMDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDL or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between AMDL and AMDY?

AMDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMDL and 0.99% for AMDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs 4.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.