PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBA vs. YARIY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMBA vs. YARIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Yara International ASA (YARIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than YARIY's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed YARIY with an annualized return of 3.49%, while YARIY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.


AMBA

1D
-1.38%
1M
17.48%
6M
11.62%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
-1.42%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
3.49%

YARIY

1D
0.40%
1M
-10.31%
6M
20.88%
YTD
16.38%
1Y
25.08%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBA vs. YARIY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
9.12%-2.61%18.68%-25.47%-59.47%120.96%51.62%73.13%-40.46%8.54%
YARIY
Yara International ASA
16.38%57.35%-24.66%-7.15%-5.03%33.25%9.83%9.63%-14.26%27.25%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and YARIY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012

0.21

The correlation between AMBA and YARIY shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMBA:

$3.39B

YARIY:

$23.22B

EPS

AMBA:

-$1.62

YARIY:

$1.65

PS Ratio

AMBA:

8.19

YARIY:

1.19

PB Ratio

AMBA:

5.56

YARIY:

2.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMBA:

$405.19M

YARIY:

$16.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMBA:

$238.32M

YARIY:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMBA:

-$69.43M

YARIY:

$3.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBA vs. YARIY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA
AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

YARIY
YARIY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
YARIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YARIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
YARIY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
YARIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
YARIY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBA vs. YARIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Yara International ASA (YARIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMBAYARIYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.15

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.85

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

2.89

-2.29

AMBA vs. YARIY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the YARIY Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and YARIY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. YARIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum YARIY drawdown of -86.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and YARIY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBAYARIYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-86.18%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.06%

-28.14%

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.74%

-35.12%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.65%

-41.73%

-39.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.65%

-49.59%

-32.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.35%

-23.22%

-41.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.51%

-29.39%

-19.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.62%

8.24%

+16.38%

Volatility

AMBA vs. YARIY - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 35.14% compared to Yara International ASA (YARIY) at 9.89%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YARIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBAYARIYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.14%

9.89%

+25.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.00%

29.44%

+27.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.60%

33.42%

+39.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.11%

31.37%

+33.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.86%

31.17%

+26.69%

Dividends

AMBA vs. YARIY - Dividend Comparison

AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YARIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YARIY
Yara International ASA
5.15%1.18%1.79%14.57%10.07%9.09%8.17%1.81%2.14%6.95%9.08%4.00%

Financials

AMBA vs. YARIY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Yara International ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
100.36M
4.23B
(AMBA) Total Revenue
(YARIY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMBA vs. YARIY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambarella, Inc. and Yara International ASA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
58.4%
30.3%
Portfolio components
AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

YARIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Yara International ASA reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 4.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.3%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.

YARIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Yara International ASA reported an operating income of 576.00M and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.

YARIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Yara International ASA reported a net income of 326.00M and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMBA and YARIY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to YARIY (9.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs YARIY's -86.18%.

YARIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBA and YARIY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer