AMBA vs. AGRO
AMBA (Ambarella, Inc.) and AGRO (Adecoagro S.A.) are both stocks. AMBA operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while AGRO operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, AMBA returned 4.28%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for AGRO. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AMBA vs. AGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 21.40% return, which is significantly lower than AGRO's 26.83% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has outperformed AGRO with an annualized return of 4.28%, while AGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.08% annualized return.
AMBA
- 1D
- 16.08%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- 34.29%
- YTD
- 21.40%
- 1Y
- 30.13%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- -2.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.30%
AGRO
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | $7.27M | $6.92M | $10.04M |
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | $192.92M | $151.48M | $136.93M |
AMBA vs. AGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 21.40% | -2.61% | 18.68% | -25.47% | -59.47% | 120.96% | 51.62% | 73.13% | -40.46% | 8.54% |
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | 26.83% | -12.37% | -12.39% | 38.60% | 11.50% | 12.94% | -18.76% | 20.26% | -32.69% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBA and AGRO is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012 | 0.19 |
The correlation between AMBA and AGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMBA:
$3.77B
AGRO:
$5.62B
AMBA:
-$1.62
AGRO:
$0.03
AMBA:
9.15
AGRO:
3.36
AMBA:
6.19
AGRO:
2.91
AMBA:
$405.19M
AGRO:
$1.50B
AMBA:
$238.32M
AGRO:
$378.81M
AMBA:
-$69.43M
AGRO:
$466.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMBA vs. AGRO — Risk / Return Rank
AMBA
AGRO
AMBA vs. AGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMBA | AGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.30 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.19 | 0.72 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMBA vs. AGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than AGRO's maximum drawdown of -73.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and AGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMBA | AGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -73.70% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | -39.99% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.41% | -39.99% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.65% | -45.34% | -36.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.65% | -72.07% | -9.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.34% | -34.32% | -26.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.60% | -31.48% | -17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.45% | 16.44% | +9.01% |
Volatility
AMBA vs. AGRO - Volatility Comparison
Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 30.03% compared to Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) at 14.49%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMBA | AGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.03% | 14.49% | +15.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.80% | 41.25% | +19.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.25% | 49.77% | +26.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.85% | 42.21% | +23.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.34% | 40.11% | +18.23% |
Dividends
AMBA vs. AGRO - Dividend Comparison
AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | 2.97% | 4.41% | 3.63% | 2.95% | 3.83% |
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AMBA vs. AGRO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Adecoagro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMBA vs. AGRO - Profitability Comparison
AMBA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
AGRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a gross profit of 118.57M and revenue of 398.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
AMBA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.
AGRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported an operating income of 27.86M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
AMBA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.
AGRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a net income of 40.14M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMBA and AGRO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMBA has higher volatility (30.03%) compared to AGRO (14.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs AGRO's -73.70%.
AMBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMBA and AGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer