PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBA vs. AGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMBA vs. AGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than AGRO's 31.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has outperformed AGRO with an annualized return of 3.49%, while AGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


AMBA

1D
-1.38%
1M
17.48%
6M
11.62%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
-1.42%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
3.49%

AGRO

1D
3.10%
1M
-11.80%
6M
24.56%
YTD
31.16%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBA vs. AGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
9.12%-2.61%18.68%-25.47%-59.47%120.96%51.62%73.13%-40.46%8.54%
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
31.16%-12.37%-12.39%38.60%11.50%12.94%-18.76%20.26%-32.69%-0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and AGRO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012

0.19

The correlation between AMBA and AGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMBA:

$3.39B

AGRO:

$5.82B

EPS

AMBA:

-$1.62

AGRO:

$0.03

PS Ratio

AMBA:

8.19

AGRO:

3.48

PB Ratio

AMBA:

5.56

AGRO:

3.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMBA:

$405.19M

AGRO:

$1.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMBA:

$238.32M

AGRO:

$378.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMBA:

-$69.43M

AGRO:

$466.25M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBA vs. AGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA
AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AGRO
AGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBA vs. AGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMBAAGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.41

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

1.04

-0.44

AMBA vs. AGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the AGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and AGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. AGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than AGRO's maximum drawdown of -73.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and AGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBAAGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-73.70%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.06%

-39.99%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.74%

-39.99%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.65%

-45.34%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.65%

-72.07%

-9.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.35%

-32.08%

-32.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.51%

-31.48%

-17.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.62%

15.75%

+8.87%

Volatility

AMBA vs. AGRO - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 35.14% compared to Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) at 16.23%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBAAGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.14%

16.23%

+18.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.00%

40.67%

+16.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.60%

48.55%

+24.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.11%

42.03%

+23.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.86%

39.97%

+17.89%

Dividends

AMBA vs. AGRO - Dividend Comparison

AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
2.87%4.41%3.63%2.95%3.83%
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AMBA vs. AGRO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Adecoagro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
100.36M
398.68M
(AMBA) Total Revenue
(AGRO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMBA vs. AGRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambarella, Inc. and Adecoagro S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
58.4%
29.7%
Portfolio components
AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

AGRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a gross profit of 118.57M and revenue of 398.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.

AGRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported an operating income of 27.86M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.

AGRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a net income of 40.14M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMBA and AGRO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to AGRO (16.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs AGRO's -73.70%.

AGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBA and AGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer