AMAX vs. RHRX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX).

AMAX and RHRX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMAX is an actively managed fund by Adaptive. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. RHRX is an actively managed fund by Adaptive. It was launched on Sep 20, 2012.

Performance

AMAX vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMAX vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	0.90%	11.38%	9.62%	6.70%	-12.56%	-0.20%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	4.26%	16.70%	22.21%	10.28%	-20.05%	1.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than RHRX's 4.26% return.

AMAX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.72%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: -0.88%
• 1Y: 14.84%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RHRX

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 17.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAX vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

AMAX

RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF

Return for Risk

AMAX vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX

AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 82
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMAX	RHRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.56	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.32	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.34	-0.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.57	12.41	-5.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMAX vs. RHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the RHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and RHRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMAX	RHRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.56	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.35	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and RHRX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMAX vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, while RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	10.50%	9.18%	7.36%	6.99%	11.22%	1.00%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and RHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAX	RHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.28%	-25.33%	+9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-12.82%	+5.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-2.27%	-3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-9.28%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.42%	-0.04%

Volatility

AMAX vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 3.97%, while RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAX	RHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	4.70%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	9.95%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	19.13%	-7.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.38%	19.18%	-8.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.38%	19.18%	-8.80%