RHRX vs. QQWZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ).

RHRX and QQWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RHRX is an actively managed fund by Adaptive. It was launched on Sep 20, 2012. QQWZ is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on May 6, 2025.

Performance

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	4.26%	23.36%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	4.75%	26.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than QQWZ's 4.75% return.

RHRX

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 17.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQWZ

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

QQWZ

Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

Return for Risk

RHRX vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 82
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.41	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	2.52	-2.17

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and QQWZ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.

	TTM	2025
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.35%	0.11%

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than QQWZ's maximum drawdown of -7.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and QQWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-7.81%	-17.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-3.61%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-1.29%	-7.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.13%	14.51%	+4.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.18%	14.51%	+4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	14.51%	+4.67%