RHRX vs. QQWZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) and QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RHRX is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Adaptive, while QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RHRX returned 42.26% vs 39.15% for QQWZ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RHRX charges 1.36%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQWZ.

Performance

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than QQWZ's 19.20% return.

RHRX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 21.71%
• 6M: 22.05%
• 1Y: 42.26%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQWZ

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 10.69%
• YTD: 19.20%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: 39.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	21.71%	23.36%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	19.20%	26.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and QQWZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025	0.78

The correlation between RHRX and QQWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RHRX vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 91
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.22	2.86	+0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.33	3.76	+0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.51	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.28	5.12	+1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.67	18.90	+5.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is comparable to the QQWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHRX and QQWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22	2.86	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	3.30	-2.76

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than QQWZ's maximum drawdown of -7.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and QQWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-7.81%	-17.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-7.81%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.96%	-1.37%	-7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	2.12%	-0.38%

Volatility

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Volatility Comparison

RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RHRX	QQWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	4.34%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	8.86%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	13.77%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	14.24%	+4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.04%	14.24%	+4.80%

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

RHRX vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.

Position	TTM	2025
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.31%	0.11%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RHRX and QQWZ in my portfolio?

RHRX and QQWZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RHRX or QQWZ?

RHRX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to QQWZ (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHRX dropped -25.33% vs QQWZ's -7.81%.

Which ETF is better, RHRX or QQWZ?

On 1-year performance, RHRX leads with 42.26% vs 39.15% for QQWZ. On fees, QQWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QQWZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RHRX or QQWZ?

Over the 1-year period, RHRX has performed better with a 42.26% return vs 39.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RHRX or QQWZ?

QQWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RHRX or QQWZ?

QQWZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.

What is the main difference between RHRX and QQWZ?

RHRX is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QQWZ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 0.49% for QQWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.