PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTL vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ALTL vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALTL vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
2.39%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.34%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%3.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -0.34% return.


ALTL

1D
0.37%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
2.39%
6M
4.18%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*

CCOR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.35%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ALTL vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ALTL vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTL vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTLCCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

-0.14

+1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

-0.14

+2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.98

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

-0.19

+3.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.34

-0.35

+10.69

ALTL vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTL and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTLCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

-0.14

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.08

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.15

+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between ALTL and CCOR is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ALTL vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, which matches CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
1.07%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%

Drawdowns

ALTL vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTLCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.91%

-22.99%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.17%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

-22.99%

-8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-17.23%

+11.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-7.07%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

4.95%

-2.13%

Volatility

ALTL vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that ALTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ALTLCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.17%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

5.44%

+7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

10.74%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

11.13%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.11%

10.81%

+9.30%