ALRG vs. FNDB
ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALRG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Allspring, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. ALRG is actively managed, while FNDB is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
ALRG vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 14.46% return.
ALRG
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDB
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 14.46%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 32.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
ALRG vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF | 9.39% | 11.95% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 14.46% | 10.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALRG and FNDB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.77 |
ALRG vs. FNDB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ALRG
FNDB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ALRG
FNDB
Financial Services
ALRG
FNDB
Communication Services
ALRG
FNDB
Industrials
ALRG
FNDB
Consumer Cyclical
ALRG
FNDB
Healthcare
ALRG
FNDB
Energy
ALRG
FNDB
Consumer Defensive
ALRG
FNDB
Basic Materials
ALRG
FNDB
Real Estate
ALRG
-
FNDB
Utilities
ALRG
-
FNDB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALRG vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
ALRG
FNDB
ALRG vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALRG | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.01 | 0.79 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
ALRG vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALRG | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.27% | -38.17% | +28.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.15% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -3.66% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
ALRG vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALRG | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.52% | 10.72% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 15.36% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 17.48% | -4.96% |
ALRG vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALRG vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FNDB's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALRG and FNDB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ALRG.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.43% for ALRG.
ALRG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 0.25% for FNDB.
Find the right allocation for ALRG and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer