ALRG vs. AGRW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALRG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Allspring, while AGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ALRG returned 21.47% vs 12.48% for AGRW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AGRW.

Performance

ALRG vs. AGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than AGRW's 5.86% return.

ALRG

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: 7.47%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGRW

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 5.05%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 1Y: 12.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. AGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	9.44%	11.78%
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	5.86%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and AGRW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.87

The correlation between ALRG and AGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ALRG vs. AGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALRG

ALRG Risk / Return Rank: 63
ALRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ALRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ALRG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ALRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ALRG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AGRW

AGRW Risk / Return Rank: 24
AGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
AGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
AGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
AGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALRG vs. AGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALRG	AGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	0.75	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	1.11	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.14	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	0.76	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.58	2.36	+7.21

ALRG vs. AGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the AGRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALRG and AGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. AGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum AGRW drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and AGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALRG	AGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-16.46%	+7.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.27%	-16.46%	+7.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-4.97%	+4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-3.48%	+2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	5.29%	-3.04%

Volatility

ALRG vs. AGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) is 3.65%, while Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that ALRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALRG	AGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	5.39%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	13.54%	-3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	16.73%	-3.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.68%	21.85%	-9.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.68%	21.85%	-9.17%

ALRG vs. AGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRW's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALRG vs. AGRW - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than AGRW's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	0.12%	0.13%
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.43%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALRG and AGRW in my portfolio?

ALRG and AGRW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALRG or AGRW?

AGRW has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to ALRG (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALRG dropped -9.27% vs AGRW's -16.46%.

Which ETF is better, ALRG or AGRW?

On 1-year performance, ALRG leads with 21.47% vs 12.48% for AGRW. On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, ALRG has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALRG or AGRW?

Over the 1-year period, ALRG has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALRG or AGRW?

ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALRG or AGRW?

ALRG has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.12% for AGRW.

What is the main difference between ALRG and AGRW?

ALRG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 0.35% for AGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.