PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALMS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALMS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alumis Inc (ALMS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMS achieves a 152.05% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return.


ALMS

1D
5.08%
1M
11.72%
YTD
152.05%
6M
120.04%
1Y
760.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALMS
Alumis Inc
152.05%24.17%-41.78%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMS and VOO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALMS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMS
ALMS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ALMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alumis Inc (ALMS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALMSVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.39

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.94

3.02

+17.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

54.87

13.58

+41.29

ALMS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMS Sharpe Ratio is 6.29, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALMS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMS drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALMSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.26%

-33.99%

-45.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.66%

-8.90%

-27.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.95%

-1.74%

-16.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-3.68%

-34.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.96%

1.98%

+11.98%

Volatility

ALMS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Alumis Inc (ALMS) has a higher volatility of 21.23% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that ALMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALMSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.23%

4.60%

+16.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

85.57%

9.73%

+75.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

122.19%

12.39%

+109.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.21%

16.90%

+99.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.21%

18.05%

+98.16%

Dividends

ALMS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ALMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALMS
Alumis Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALMS and VOO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALMS has higher volatility (21.23%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMS dropped -79.26% vs VOO's -33.99%.

ALMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.29 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALMS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer