ALMS vs. PHVS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alumis Inc (ALMS) and Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS).

Performance

ALMS vs. PHVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alumis Inc (ALMS) and Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALMS vs. PHVS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ALMS Alumis Inc	125.72%	24.17%	-40.90%
PHVS Pharvaris N.V.	1.80%	44.76%	1.97%

Fundamentals

EPS ALMS : -$2.71 PHVS : -$2.84
Total Revenue (TTM) ALMS : $22.12M PHVS : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) ALMS : $21.30M PHVS : -$97.02K
EBITDA (TTM) ALMS : -$424.43M PHVS : -$155.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMS achieves a 125.72% return, which is significantly higher than PHVS's 1.80% return.

ALMS

• 1D: 9.01%
• 1M: -25.80%
• YTD: 125.72%
• 6M: 452.13%
• 1Y: 258.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PHVS

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 79.94%
• 3Y*: 51.93%
• 5Y*: 0.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALMS vs. PHVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMS

ALMS Risk / Return Rank: 89
ALMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ALMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ALMS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ALMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ALMS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

PHVS

PHVS Risk / Return Rank: 81
PHVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PHVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PHVS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PHVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PHVS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMS vs. PHVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alumis Inc (ALMS) and Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALMS	PHVS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.20	+0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	2.10	+1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.24	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	3.20	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.31	7.27	-0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALMS vs. PHVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the PHVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMS and PHVS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALMS	PHVS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	1.20	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	-0.00	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between ALMS and PHVS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALMS vs. PHVS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALMS nor PHVS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ALMS vs. PHVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMS drawdown since its inception was -78.95%, smaller than the maximum PHVS drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMS and PHVS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMS	PHVS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.95%	-95.06%	+16.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.19%	-21.93%	-50.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-93.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.52%	-29.57%	+3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-53.83%	+14.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.03%	10.84%	+35.19%

Volatility

ALMS vs. PHVS - Volatility Comparison

Alumis Inc (ALMS) has a higher volatility of 29.29% compared to Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) at 14.30%. This indicates that ALMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMS	PHVS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.29%	14.30%	+14.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	89.40%	43.14%	+46.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	141.57%	67.19%	+74.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.37%	177.81%	-56.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.37%	176.41%	-55.04%

Financials