PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALMS vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALMS vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alumis Inc (ALMS) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMS achieves a 152.05% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 110.24% return.


ALMS

1D
5.08%
1M
11.72%
YTD
152.05%
6M
120.04%
1Y
760.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRDO

1D
11.29%
1M
38.51%
YTD
110.24%
6M
101.76%
1Y
253.78%
3Y*
158.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMS vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALMS
Alumis Inc
152.05%24.17%-41.78%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
110.24%114.09%114.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMS and CRDO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALMS:

$3.08B

CRDO:

$58.29B

EPS

ALMS:

-$2.31

CRDO:

$2.50

PS Ratio

ALMS:

300.47

CRDO:

42.88

PB Ratio

ALMS:

5.43

CRDO:

28.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALMS:

$8.40M

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALMS:

$5.79M

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALMS:

-$411.89M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALMS vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMS
ALMS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ALMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMS vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alumis Inc (ALMS) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALMSCRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.36

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.94

4.77

+16.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

54.87

11.50

+43.37

ALMS vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMS Sharpe Ratio is 6.29, which is higher than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMS and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALMS vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMS drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMS and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALMSCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.26%

-62.04%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.66%

-53.59%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.95%

0.00%

-17.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-19.31%

-19.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.96%

22.18%

-8.22%

Volatility

ALMS vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alumis Inc (ALMS) is 21.23%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 27.04%. This indicates that ALMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALMSCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.23%

27.04%

-5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

85.57%

66.46%

+19.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

122.19%

86.84%

+35.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.21%

81.71%

+34.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.21%

81.71%

+34.50%

Dividends

ALMS vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALMS nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALMS vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alumis Inc and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
1.74M
437.00M
(ALMS) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ALMS and CRDO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (27.04%) compared to ALMS (21.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMS dropped -79.26% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

ALMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.29 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALMS and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer