PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLW vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ALLW vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALLW vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's -8.12% return.


ALLW

1D
1.98%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
4.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYG

1D
4.08%
1M
-5.34%
YTD
-8.12%
6M
-6.05%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
15.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ALLW vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ALLW vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALLWSPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.01

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

1.58

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.66

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.17

6.54

+3.63

ALLW vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and SPYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALLWSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.01

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.31

+1.20

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and SPYG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ALLW vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than SPYG's 0.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.45%4.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.58%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and SPYG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLWSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-67.63%

+58.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-13.76%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-10.24%

+5.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-24.48%

+23.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.50%

-1.48%

Volatility

ALLW vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) is 5.41%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that ALLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ALLWSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

7.20%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

12.83%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

22.39%

-9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

21.13%

-8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.83%

20.57%

-7.74%