ALLW vs. IALT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ALLW (State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF) and IALT (iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALLW is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by State Street, while IALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ALLW charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IALT.

Performance

ALLW vs. IALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than IALT's 13.85% return.

ALLW

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 2.81%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 1Y: 17.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.64%

IALT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: 11.00%
• YTD: 13.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	$11.63M	$11.75M	$17.60M
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF	$40.45M	$35.41M	$114.47M

ALLW vs. IALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	6.33%	0.65%
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF	13.85%	0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and IALT is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

ALLW vs. IALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ALLW

ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 64
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 65

IALT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ALLW vs. IALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALLW	IALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.05	—	—

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. IALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, which is greater than IALT's maximum drawdown of -2.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and IALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALLW	IALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-2.27%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-0.55%	-2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-0.49%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALLW	IALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.15%	8.01%	+3.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.44%	8.01%	+4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.44%	8.01%	+4.43%

ALLW vs. IALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than IALT's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALLW vs. IALT - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than IALT's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.40%	4.67%
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF	0.39%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALLW and IALT in my portfolio?

ALLW and IALT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALLW or IALT?

On fees, ALLW is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALLW or IALT?

ALLW is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALLW or IALT?

ALLW has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.39% for IALT.

What is the main difference between ALLW and IALT?

ALLW is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while IALT is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ALLW and 0.99% for IALT.