ALLT vs. IETC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC).

IETC is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Mar 21, 2018.

Performance

ALLT vs. IETC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALLT vs. IETC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ALLT Allot Communications Ltd	-29.60%	65.21%	260.61%	-52.03%	-71.04%	12.93%	23.76%	40.03%	6.68%
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	-12.16%	19.56%	37.57%	54.35%	-32.78%	29.73%	46.59%	43.09%	-3.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLT achieves a -29.60% return, which is significantly lower than IETC's -12.16% return.

ALLT

• 1D: 3.90%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: -29.60%
• 6M: -34.03%
• 1Y: 25.14%
• 3Y*: 37.02%
• 5Y*: -16.03%
• 10Y*: 3.08%

IETC

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 6M: -12.68%
• 1Y: 18.40%
• 3Y*: 24.35%
• 5Y*: 13.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALLT vs. IETC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLT

ALLT Risk / Return Rank: 53
ALLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ALLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ALLT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ALLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ALLT Martin Ratio Rank: 53

IETC

IETC Risk / Return Rank: 35
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLT vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALLT	IETC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	0.70	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	1.16	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.15	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	0.92	-0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.10	2.74	-1.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALLT vs. IETC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the IETC Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLT and IETC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALLT	IETC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	0.70	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	0.55	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	0.73	-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between ALLT and IETC is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALLT vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison

ALLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ALLT Allot Communications Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	0.44%	0.38%	0.52%	0.79%	0.92%	0.73%	0.48%	0.95%	1.27%

Drawdowns

ALLT vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLT drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, which is greater than IETC's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLT and IETC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALLT	IETC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.42%	-38.48%	-56.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.65%	-21.19%	-24.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.72%	-38.48%	-55.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.31%	-17.25%	-58.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.60%	-8.20%	-56.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.32%	7.11%	+12.21%

Volatility

ALLT vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison

Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) has a higher volatility of 14.30% compared to iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) at 8.02%. This indicates that ALLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IETC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALLT	IETC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.30%	8.02%	+6.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.89%	16.78%	+35.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.34%	26.60%	+45.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.41%	24.39%	+36.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.98%	25.43%	+26.55%