CGNT vs. VRT
CGNT (Cognyte Software Ltd.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. CGNT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CGNT returned -18.91%/yr vs 63.70%/yr for VRT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGNT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGNT achieves a -13.19% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 96.57% return.
CGNT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -19.21%
- YTD
- -13.19%
- 6M
- -14.47%
- 1Y
- -11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- -18.91%
- 10Y*
- —
VRT
- 1D
- -11.07%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 96.57%
- 6M
- 91.55%
- 1Y
- 173.44%
- 3Y*
- 138.19%
- 5Y*
- 63.70%
- 10Y*
- —
CGNT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd. | -13.19% | 8.67% | 34.53% | 106.75% | -80.15% | -53.15% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 96.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGNT and VRT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CGNT and VRT has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CGNT:
$596.19M
VRT:
$124.82B
CGNT:
-$0.04
VRT:
$3.99
CGNT:
1.47
VRT:
11.48
CGNT:
3.05
VRT:
29.41
CGNT:
$409.99M
VRT:
$10.84B
CGNT:
$297.63M
VRT:
$3.92B
CGNT:
$23.41M
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGNT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
CGNT
VRT
CGNT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGNT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.42 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 6.89 | -7.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 18.18 | -18.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGNT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGNT drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNT and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGNT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -71.24% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.76% | -25.32% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.34% | -61.28% | +16.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.66% | -71.24% | -20.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.61% | -15.37% | -60.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.81% | -16.22% | -53.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.72% | 9.58% | +4.14% |
Volatility
CGNT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) has a higher volatility of 27.47% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 20.96%. This indicates that CGNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGNT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.47% | 20.96% | +6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.57% | 46.74% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.92% | 60.09% | -9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.80% | 62.33% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.66% | 54.83% | +2.83% |
Dividends
CGNT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
CGNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
CGNT vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cognyte Software Ltd. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CGNT vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
CGNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 76.12M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.2%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
CGNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.41M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
CGNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a net income of -3.04M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of -2.9%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CGNT and VRT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGNT has higher volatility (27.47%) compared to VRT (20.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNT dropped -92.97% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGNT and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer