CGNT vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGNT (Cognyte Software Ltd.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. CGNT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CGNT returned -18.22%/yr vs 67.37%/yr for VRT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CGNT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGNT achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 104.63% return.

CGNT

• 1D: -20.57%
• 1M: -8.70%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: -16.55%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: -18.22%
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 104.63%
• 6M: 85.33%
• 1Y: 195.39%
• 3Y*: 156.10%
• 5Y*: 67.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGNT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd.	-1.81%	8.67%	34.53%	106.75%	-80.15%	-44.06%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	104.63%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CGNT and VRT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021	0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between CGNT and VRT has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CGNT : $694.86M VRT : $129.97B
EPS CGNT : -$0.01 VRT : $3.99
PS Ratio CGNT : 1.71 VRT : 11.95
PB Ratio CGNT : 3.36 VRT : 30.62
Total Revenue (TTM) CGNT : $400.04M VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) CGNT : $289.65M VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) CGNT : $23.09M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

CGNT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGNT

CGNT Risk / Return Rank: 28
CGNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CGNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CGNT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CGNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CGNT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 94
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGNT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGNT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.31	3.42	-3.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	3.75	-3.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.47	-0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	7.94	-8.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	22.67	-23.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGNT vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGNT and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGNT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31	3.42	-3.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	1.10	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	1.04	-1.37

Drawdowns

CGNT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGNT drawdown since its inception was -92.66%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNT and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGNT	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.66%	-71.24%	-21.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.34%	-24.78%	-19.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.34%	-61.28%	+16.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.66%	-71.24%	-20.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.17%	-11.90%	-59.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.43%	-16.22%	-52.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.30%	8.66%	+14.64%

Volatility

CGNT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) has a higher volatility of 30.48% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.92%. This indicates that CGNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGNT	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.48%	16.92%	+13.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.39%	44.82%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.94%	57.51%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.77%	61.71%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.48%	54.58%	+2.90%

Dividends

CGNT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

CGNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.06%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

CGNT vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cognyte Software Ltd. and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CGNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 78.70M and revenue of 106.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

CGNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 6.53M and revenue of 106.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

CGNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a net income of 3.76M and revenue of 106.24M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGNT and VRT in my portfolio?

CGNT and VRT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGNT or VRT?

CGNT has higher volatility (30.48%) compared to VRT (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNT dropped -92.66% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.