PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGNT vs. ATEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CGNT vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGNT achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 78.64% return.


CGNT

1D
-20.57%
1M
-8.70%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
8.21%
1Y
-16.55%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
-18.22%
10Y*

ATEN

1D
-3.68%
1M
16.52%
YTD
78.64%
6M
79.14%
1Y
78.86%
3Y*
30.27%
5Y*
27.49%
10Y*
17.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGNT vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CGNT
Cognyte Software Ltd.
-1.81%8.67%34.53%106.75%-80.15%-44.06%
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
78.64%-2.59%42.08%-19.43%1.70%65.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CGNT and ATEN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021

0.32

The correlation between CGNT and ATEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (5 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGNT:

$694.86M

ATEN:

$2.29B

EPS

CGNT:

-$0.01

ATEN:

$0.61

PS Ratio

CGNT:

1.71

ATEN:

7.66

PB Ratio

CGNT:

3.36

ATEN:

10.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGNT:

$400.04M

ATEN:

$299.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGNT:

$289.65M

ATEN:

$237.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

CGNT:

$23.09M

ATEN:

$67.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGNT vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGNT
CGNT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CGNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGNT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CGNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGNT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ATEN
ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGNT vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGNTATENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.39

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

4.59

-4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

8.72

-9.44

CGNT vs. ATEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the ATEN Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGNT and ATEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGNTATENDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

2.47

-2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.65

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

0.13

-0.46

Drawdowns

CGNT vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGNT drawdown since its inception was -92.66%, which is greater than ATEN's maximum drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNT and ATEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGNTATENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.66%

-78.29%

-14.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.34%

-17.26%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.34%

-32.14%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.66%

-43.87%

-47.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.17%

-3.68%

-67.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.43%

-40.27%

-28.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.30%

9.07%

+14.23%

Volatility

CGNT vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison

Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) has a higher volatility of 30.48% compared to A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) at 9.20%. This indicates that CGNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGNTATENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.48%

9.20%

+21.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.39%

24.65%

+20.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.94%

32.10%

+20.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.77%

42.35%

+15.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.48%

43.10%

+14.38%

Dividends

CGNT vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison

CGNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
0.76%1.36%1.30%1.82%1.26%0.30%
CGNT
Cognyte Software Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CGNT vs. ATEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cognyte Software Ltd. and A10 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00M70.00M80.00M90.00M100.00M110.00M120.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
106.24M
75.00M
(CGNT) Total Revenue
(ATEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CGNT vs. ATEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cognyte Software Ltd. and A10 Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
74.1%
79.6%
Portfolio components
CGNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 78.70M and revenue of 106.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.72M and revenue of 75.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

CGNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 6.53M and revenue of 106.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.00M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

CGNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a net income of 3.76M and revenue of 106.24M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CGNT and ATEN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGNT has higher volatility (30.48%) compared to ATEN (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNT dropped -92.66% vs ATEN's -78.29%.

ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGNT and ATEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer