CGNT vs. ATEN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN).

Performance

CGNT vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGNT vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd.	-13.83%	8.67%	34.53%	106.75%	-80.15%	-44.06%
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	31.08%	-2.59%	42.08%	-19.43%	1.70%	65.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CGNT : $609.79M ATEN : $1.68B
EPS CGNT : -$0.01 ATEN : $0.58
PS Ratio CGNT : 1.49 ATEN : 5.80
PB Ratio CGNT : 2.95 ATEN : 7.94
Total Revenue (TTM) CGNT : $400.04M ATEN : $290.56M
Gross Profit (TTM) CGNT : $289.65M ATEN : $230.52M
EBITDA (TTM) CGNT : $23.09M ATEN : $63.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGNT achieves a -13.83% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 31.08% return.

CGNT

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: 14.25%
• YTD: -13.83%
• 6M: -3.57%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: 33.69%
• 5Y*: -22.17%
• 10Y*: —

ATEN

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: 20.04%
• YTD: 31.08%
• 6M: 28.20%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: 16.05%
• 5Y*: 20.47%
• 10Y*: 14.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CGNT vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGNT

CGNT Risk / Return Rank: 42
CGNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CGNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CGNT Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CGNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CGNT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ATEN

ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 78
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGNT vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGNT	ATEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	1.35	-1.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	1.98	-1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.25	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	2.32	-2.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.08	4.33	-4.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGNT vs. ATEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the ATEN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGNT and ATEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGNT	ATEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08	1.35	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	0.49	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	0.08	-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between CGNT and ATEN is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CGNT vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison

CGNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	1.04%	1.36%	1.30%	1.82%	1.26%	0.30%

Drawdowns

CGNT vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGNT drawdown since its inception was -92.66%, which is greater than ATEN's maximum drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNT and ATEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGNT	ATEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.66%	-78.29%	-14.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.34%	-17.26%	-27.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.71%	-43.87%	-47.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.70%	-0.60%	-74.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.41%	-40.84%	-27.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.42%	9.24%	+13.18%

Volatility

CGNT vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison

Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) has a higher volatility of 14.93% compared to A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) at 9.39%. This indicates that CGNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGNT	ATEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.93%	9.39%	+5.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.34%	22.77%	+9.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.12%	32.28%	+16.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.34%	42.24%	+14.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.57%	43.12%	+13.45%

Financials

CGNT vs. ATEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cognyte Software Ltd. and A10 Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CGNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 78.70M and revenue of 106.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.26M and revenue of 80.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.7%.

CGNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 6.53M and revenue of 106.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.06M and revenue of 80.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

CGNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a net income of 3.76M and revenue of 106.24M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 9.87M and revenue of 80.36M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.