CGNT vs. ATEN
CGNT (Cognyte Software Ltd.) and ATEN (A10 Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, CGNT returned -19.61%/yr vs 19.37%/yr for ATEN. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CGNT vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGNT achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 70.17% return.
CGNT
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -2.45%
- 1Y
- 1.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- -19.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.97%
ATEN
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -17.49%
- 6M
- 70.17%
- YTD
- 70.17%
- 1Y
- 70.77%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 19.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.22M | $43.35M | $39.53M | |
| $3.38M | $4.42M | $6.86M |
CGNT vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd. | -2.45% | 8.67% | 34.53% | 106.75% | -80.15% | -53.15% |
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 70.17% | -2.59% | 42.08% | -19.43% | 1.70% | 65.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGNT and ATEN is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
CGNT:
$675.88M
ATEN:
$2.16B
CGNT:
-$0.04
ATEN:
$0.61
CGNT:
1.65
ATEN:
7.29
CGNT:
3.42
ATEN:
9.89
CGNT:
$409.99M
ATEN:
$299.42M
CGNT:
$297.63M
ATEN:
$237.54M
CGNT:
$23.41M
ATEN:
$67.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGNT vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank
CGNT
ATEN
CGNT vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGNT | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.33 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 2.91 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 12.59 | -12.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGNT vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGNT drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than ATEN's maximum drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNT and ATEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGNT | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -78.29% | -14.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.76% | -24.48% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.34% | -32.10% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.66% | -43.87% | -47.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.59% | -21.41% | -51.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.89% | -39.80% | -30.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.61% | 5.64% | +10.97% |
Volatility
CGNT vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) is 10.28%, while A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) has a volatility of 13.59%. This indicates that CGNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGNT | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.28% | 13.59% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.96% | 28.79% | +16.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.60% | 34.78% | +16.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.90% | 42.27% | +15.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.33% | 43.27% | +14.06% |
Dividends
CGNT vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison
CGNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 0.80% | 1.36% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 1.26% | 0.30% |
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CGNT vs. ATEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cognyte Software Ltd. and A10 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CGNT vs. ATEN - Profitability Comparison
CGNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 76.12M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.2%.
ATEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.72M and revenue of 75.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.
CGNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.41M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
ATEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.00M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
CGNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cognyte Software Ltd. reported a net income of -3.04M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of -2.9%.
ATEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CGNT and ATEN have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATEN has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to CGNT (10.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNT dropped -92.97% vs ATEN's -78.29%.
ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGNT and ATEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer