ALL vs. GRMN
ALL (The Allstate Corporation) and GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) are both stocks. ALL operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while GRMN operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ALL returned 15.27%/yr vs 22.02%/yr for GRMN. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALL vs. GRMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALL achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than GRMN's 17.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ALL has underperformed GRMN with an annualized return of 15.27%, while GRMN has yielded a comparatively higher 22.02% annualized return.
ALL
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
GRMN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
ALL vs. GRMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALL The Allstate Corporation | 7.58% | 10.09% | 40.61% | 6.37% | 18.37% | 9.86% | -0.12% | 38.82% | -19.52% | 43.64% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 17.83% | -0.06% | 63.25% | 43.12% | -30.20% | 15.90% | 25.86% | 58.13% | 9.84% | 27.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALL and GRMN is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2000 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ALL and GRMN has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ALL:
$58.20B
GRMN:
$46.09B
ALL:
$45.76
GRMN:
$8.97
ALL:
4.84
GRMN:
26.55
ALL:
0.13
GRMN:
2.13
ALL:
0.88
GRMN:
6.18
ALL:
1.97
GRMN:
4.97
ALL:
$67.14B
GRMN:
$7.46B
ALL:
$19.06B
GRMN:
$4.41B
ALL:
$13.09B
GRMN:
$2.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALL vs. GRMN — Risk / Return Rank
ALL
GRMN
ALL vs. GRMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Allstate Corporation (ALL) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALL | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 0.58 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 1.27 | +1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALL vs. GRMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALL drawdown since its inception was -77.03%, smaller than the maximum GRMN drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALL and GRMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALL | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.03% | -87.71% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -27.97% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.11% | -27.97% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -54.63% | +27.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.39% | -54.63% | +13.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -11.00% | +10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -31.54% | +15.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 12.79% | -8.33% |
Volatility
ALL vs. GRMN - Volatility Comparison
The Allstate Corporation (ALL) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) at 8.24%. This indicates that ALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALL | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 8.24% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 22.18% | -4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.73% | 30.32% | -6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 30.41% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 28.36% | -3.41% |
Dividends
ALL vs. GRMN - Dividend Comparison
ALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than GRMN's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALL The Allstate Corporation | 1.88% | 1.92% | 1.91% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.75% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 1.41% | 1.78% | 1.93% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 1.51% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% |
Financials
ALL vs. GRMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Allstate Corporation and Garmin Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALL vs. GRMN - Profitability Comparison
ALL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Allstate Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 16.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GRMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
ALL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Allstate Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 16.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GRMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 431.67M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.
ALL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Allstate Corporation reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 16.94B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.
GRMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 405.08M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALL and GRMN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALL has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to GRMN (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALL dropped -77.03% vs GRMN's -87.71%.
ALL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALL and GRMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer