PortfoliosLab logo
ALL vs. AFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALL and AFL is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ALL vs. AFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Allstate Corporation (ALL) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALL:

1.01

AFL:

1.05

Sortino Ratio

ALL:

1.32

AFL:

1.56

Omega Ratio

ALL:

1.18

AFL:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

ALL:

1.65

AFL:

2.05

Martin Ratio

ALL:

4.52

AFL:

4.62

Ulcer Index

ALL:

5.15%

AFL:

5.57%

Daily Std Dev

ALL:

25.86%

AFL:

22.46%

Max Drawdown

ALL:

-77.03%

AFL:

-82.71%

Current Drawdown

ALL:

-2.34%

AFL:

-7.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALL:

$54.36B

AFL:

$57.19B

EPS

ALL:

$14.64

AFL:

$6.43

PE Ratio

ALL:

14.02

AFL:

16.45

PEG Ratio

ALL:

2.09

AFL:

0.93

PS Ratio

ALL:

0.83

AFL:

3.39

PB Ratio

ALL:

2.65

AFL:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALL:

$65.30B

AFL:

$17.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALL:

$65.30B

AFL:

$13.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALL:

$5.82B

AFL:

$4.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALL achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ALL has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 14.19%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.39% annualized return.


ALL

YTD

7.01%

1M

5.52%

6M

5.84%

1Y

25.94%

5Y*

19.59%

10Y*

14.19%

AFL

YTD

2.83%

1M

-2.08%

6M

-2.58%

1Y

23.43%

5Y*

29.47%

10Y*

15.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALL vs. AFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALL is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALL is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALL is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALL is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALL is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALL is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFL is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFL is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFL is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFL is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFL is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFL is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALL vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Allstate Corporation (ALL) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ALL Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the AFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALL and AFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ALL vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison

ALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than AFL's 1.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALL
The Allstate Corporation
1.83%1.91%2.54%2.51%2.75%1.96%1.78%2.23%1.41%1.78%1.93%1.59%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
1.97%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%

Drawdowns

ALL vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALL drawdown since its inception was -77.03%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALL and AFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ALL vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is 6.83%, while Aflac Incorporated (AFL) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that ALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ALL vs. AFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Allstate Corporation and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20212022202320242025
16.46B
3.40B
(ALL) Total Revenue
(AFL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALL vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Allstate Corporation and Aflac Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
-1.5%
(ALL) Gross Margin
(AFL) Gross Margin
ALL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Allstate Corporation reported a gross profit of 16.46B and revenue of 16.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of -50.00M and revenue of 3.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.5%.

ALL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Allstate Corporation reported an operating income of 719.00M and revenue of 16.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 145.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

ALL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Allstate Corporation reported a net income of 595.00M and revenue of 16.46B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 29.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.