ALKS vs. HAL
ALKS (Alkermes plc) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. ALKS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ALKS returned 0.53%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for HAL. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALKS vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALKS achieves a 58.26% return, which is significantly higher than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ALKS has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of 0.53%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher 0.88% annualized return.
ALKS
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 58.26%
- 6M
- 55.37%
- 1Y
- 43.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 0.53%
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
ALKS vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALKS Alkermes plc | 58.26% | -2.71% | 3.68% | 6.16% | 12.34% | 16.59% | -2.21% | -30.87% | -46.08% | -1.53% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALKS and HAL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 1991 | 0.19 |
The correlation between ALKS and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ALKS:
$7.36B
HAL:
$33.22B
ALKS:
$0.91
HAL:
$1.82
ALKS:
48.70
HAL:
21.80
ALKS:
0.20
HAL:
3.48
ALKS:
4.76
HAL:
1.51
ALKS:
4.20
HAL:
3.07
ALKS:
$1.56B
HAL:
$22.17B
ALKS:
$1.02B
HAL:
$3.40B
ALKS:
$249.70M
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALKS vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
ALKS
HAL
ALKS vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alkermes plc (ALKS) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALKS | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 6.47 | -4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 16.47 | -11.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALKS vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALKS drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, roughly equal to the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALKS and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALKS | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.14% | -92.99% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.20% | -13.10% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.58% | -54.01% | +22.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.18% | -54.01% | +20.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.58% | -91.45% | +10.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.84% | -32.89% | -21.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.23% | -39.12% | -28.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.81% | 5.14% | +4.67% |
Volatility
ALKS vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
Alkermes plc (ALKS) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 9.32%. This indicates that ALKS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALKS | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 9.32% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.32% | 24.13% | +6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.87% | 36.76% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.32% | 40.18% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.29% | 45.96% | -4.67% |
Dividends
ALKS vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
ALKS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALKS Alkermes plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
ALKS vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alkermes plc and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALKS vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
ALKS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkermes plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 392.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
ALKS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkermes plc reported an operating income of -48.28M and revenue of 392.91M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.3%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
ALKS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkermes plc reported a net income of -66.48M and revenue of 392.91M, resulting in a net margin of -16.9%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALKS and HAL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALKS has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to HAL (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALKS dropped -96.14% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALKS and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer