PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALKS vs. ADNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALKS vs. ADNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alkermes plc (ALKS) and Adient plc (ADNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALKS achieves a 71.80% return, which is significantly higher than ADNT's 6.89% return.


ALKS

1D
4.45%
1M
30.62%
YTD
71.80%
6M
68.73%
1Y
64.29%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
1.29%

ADNT

1D
-0.49%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
6.89%
6M
6.22%
1Y
8.13%
3Y*
-17.23%
5Y*
-14.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALKS vs. ADNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALKS
Alkermes plc
71.80%-2.71%3.68%6.16%12.34%16.59%-2.21%-30.87%-46.08%-1.53%
ADNT
Adient plc
6.89%11.26%-52.61%4.81%-27.55%37.70%63.62%41.10%-80.44%35.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ALKS and ADNT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2016

0.23

The correlation between ALKS and ADNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALKS:

$7.99B

ADNT:

$1.62B

EPS

ALKS:

$0.91

ADNT:

$0.73

PE Ratio

ALKS:

52.86

ADNT:

28.04

PS Ratio

ALKS:

5.17

ADNT:

0.11

PB Ratio

ALKS:

4.56

ADNT:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALKS:

$1.56B

ADNT:

$14.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALKS:

$1.02B

ADNT:

$963.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALKS:

$249.70M

ADNT:

$690.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALKS vs. ADNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALKS
ALKS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALKS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ALKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALKS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ADNT
ADNT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ADNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADNT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ADNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADNT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALKS vs. ADNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alkermes plc (ALKS) and Adient plc (ADNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALKSADNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.07

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

0.26

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

0.48

+6.28

ALKS vs. ADNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALKS Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the ADNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALKS and ADNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALKS vs. ADNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALKS drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, roughly equal to the maximum ADNT drawdown of -92.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALKS and ADNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALKSADNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.14%

-92.23%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.20%

-31.19%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.98%

-76.92%

+45.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

-79.46%

+46.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.97%

-75.62%

+24.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.22%

-56.41%

-10.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.54%

17.05%

-7.51%

Volatility

ALKS vs. ADNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alkermes plc (ALKS) is 10.29%, while Adient plc (ADNT) has a volatility of 13.77%. This indicates that ALKS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALKSADNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

13.77%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.44%

35.63%

-5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.91%

47.90%

-6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.38%

48.93%

-11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.31%

59.68%

-18.37%

Dividends

ALKS vs. ADNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALKS nor ADNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADNT
Adient plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.30%1.05%
ALKS
Alkermes plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ALKS vs. ADNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alkermes plc and Adient plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
392.91M
3.87B
(ALKS) Total Revenue
(ADNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALKS vs. ADNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alkermes plc and Adient plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
6.7%
Portfolio components
ALKS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkermes plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 392.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ADNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adient plc reported a gross profit of 257.00M and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.7%.

ALKS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkermes plc reported an operating income of -48.28M and revenue of 392.91M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.3%.

ADNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adient plc reported an operating income of 119.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

ALKS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkermes plc reported a net income of -66.48M and revenue of 392.91M, resulting in a net margin of -16.9%.

ADNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adient plc reported a net income of 27.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALKS and ADNT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADNT has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to ALKS (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALKS dropped -96.14% vs ADNT's -92.23%.

ALKS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALKS and ADNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer