PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALIL vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALIL vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ALIL having a 11.27% return and CSB slightly higher at 11.28%.


ALIL

1D
-1.86%
1M
5.55%
YTD
11.27%
6M
8.99%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSB

1D
1.01%
1M
0.76%
YTD
11.28%
6M
10.03%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALIL vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ALIL and CSB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025

0.78

The correlation between ALIL and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALIL vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALIL
ALIL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ALIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALIL Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ALIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALIL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALIL vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALILCSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.92

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

8.44

-4.67

ALIL vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALIL and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALIL vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALIL drawdown since its inception was -12.60%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIL and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALILCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.60%

-42.07%

+29.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-7.18%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.75%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-7.11%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

2.48%

+1.83%

Volatility

ALIL vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.79%. This indicates that ALIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALILCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

3.79%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

9.28%

+4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

14.48%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

18.71%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

21.31%

-0.52%

ALIL vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALIL has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALIL vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

ALIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than CSB's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALIL
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF
0.42%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.22%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALIL and CSB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALIL has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to CSB (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIL dropped -12.60% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 1-year performance, CSB leads with 20.88% vs 16.19% for ALIL. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSB has performed better with a 20.88% return vs 16.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.42% for ALIL.

They also come from different issuers: Argent and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ALIL and 0.35% for CSB.

CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALIL and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer