ALGT vs. ES
ALGT (Allegiant Travel Company) and ES (Eversource Energy) are both stocks. ALGT operates in Airlines (Industrials), while ES operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, ALGT returned -3.72%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for ES. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALGT vs. ES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALGT achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than ES's 4.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ALGT has underperformed ES with an annualized return of -3.72%, while ES has yielded a comparatively higher 5.44% annualized return.
ALGT
- 1D
- 6.45%
- 1M
- 22.28%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 79.41%
- 3Y*
- -5.92%
- 5Y*
- -14.80%
- 10Y*
- -3.72%
ES
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
ALGT vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALGT Allegiant Travel Company | 7.41% | -9.40% | 16.03% | 23.44% | -63.65% | -1.16% | 9.32% | 76.98% | -33.95% | -5.16% |
ES Eversource Energy | 4.32% | 22.86% | -2.46% | -23.43% | -5.06% | 8.18% | 4.45% | 34.49% | 6.41% | 17.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALGT and ES is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2006 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
ALGT:
$1.67B
ES:
$25.87B
ALGT:
-$1.89
ES:
$4.68
ALGT:
0.63
ES:
1.84
ALGT:
1.52K
ES:
0.00
ALGT:
$2.64B
ES:
$13.93B
ALGT:
$815.04M
ES:
$4.19B
ALGT:
$340.03M
ES:
$4.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALGT vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank
ALGT
ES
ALGT vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALGT | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.09 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.61 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 1.46 | +2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALGT vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALGT drawdown since its inception was -86.01%, which is greater than ES's maximum drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALGT and ES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALGT | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.01% | -73.04% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.13% | -15.13% | -24.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.95% | -28.65% | -42.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.93% | -41.69% | -40.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.01% | -41.69% | -44.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.75% | -13.32% | -51.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -19.06% | -12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.74% | 6.30% | +10.44% |
Volatility
ALGT vs. ES - Volatility Comparison
Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) has a higher volatility of 24.27% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 7.72%. This indicates that ALGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALGT | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.27% | 7.72% | +16.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.93% | 16.00% | +28.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.71% | 24.68% | +41.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.96% | 23.94% | +31.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.42% | 24.35% | +27.07% |
Dividends
ALGT vs. ES - Dividend Comparison
ALGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALGT Allegiant Travel Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.27% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.61% | 2.79% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.64% |
ES Eversource Energy | 4.48% | 4.47% | 4.98% | 4.37% | 3.04% | 2.65% | 2.62% | 2.52% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 3.27% |
Financials
ALGT vs. ES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegiant Travel Company and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ALGT and ES have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALGT has higher volatility (24.27%) compared to ES (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALGT dropped -86.01% vs ES's -73.04%.
ALGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALGT and ES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer