PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALGT vs. ULCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALGT vs. ULCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALGT achieves a 15.02% return, which is significantly lower than ULCC's 43.31% return.


ALGT

1D
-0.94%
1M
-17.35%
6M
10.66%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
103.82%
3Y*
-5.83%
5Y*
-11.80%
10Y*
-1.20%
ALL TIME*
8.59%

ULCC

1D
-3.30%
1M
-10.95%
6M
45.47%
YTD
43.31%
1Y
70.03%
3Y*
-9.01%
5Y*
-14.46%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-17.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.80M$48.19M$57.36M
$27.68M$28.23M$28.77M

ALGT vs. ULCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
15.02%-9.40%16.03%23.44%-63.65%-23.36%
ULCC
Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.
43.31%-33.76%30.22%-46.84%-24.32%-27.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ALGT and ULCC is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.64

The correlation between ALGT and ULCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALGT:

$1.79B

ULCC:

$1.55B

EPS

ALGT:

-$1.89

ULCC:

-$2.24

PS Ratio

ALGT:

0.67

ULCC:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALGT:

$2.64B

ULCC:

$4.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALGT:

$815.04M

ULCC:

$902.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALGT:

$340.03M

ULCC:

-$272.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALGT vs. ULCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ALGT
ALGT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ULCC
ULCC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ULCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULCC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ULCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULCC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ALGT vs. ULCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALGTULCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.04

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

2.19

+3.22

ALGT vs. ULCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the ULCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALGT and ULCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALGT vs. ULCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALGT drawdown since its inception was -86.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ULCC drawdown of -87.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALGT and ULCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALGTULCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.01%

-87.04%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.13%

-52.45%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.91%

-70.38%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.93%

-83.72%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.25%

-69.19%

+6.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-60.55%

+28.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.69%

24.86%

-8.17%

Volatility

ALGT vs. ULCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) is 14.71%, while Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) has a volatility of 22.57%. This indicates that ALGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALGTULCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.71%

22.57%

-7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.49%

60.55%

-14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.40%

85.41%

-21.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.21%

70.72%

-15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.63%

69.29%

-17.66%

Dividends

ALGT vs. ULCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALGT nor ULCC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
0.00%0.00%1.27%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.61%2.79%1.81%1.44%1.64%
ULCC
Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ALGT vs. ULCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegiant Travel Company and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ALGT vs. ULCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allegiant Travel Company and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ALGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a gross profit of 479.13M and revenue of 732.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.

ULCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 683.00M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.4%.

ALGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported an operating income of 81.10M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

ULCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -97.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of -7.6%.

ALGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a net income of 42.48M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

ULCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -90.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALGT and ULCC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULCC has higher volatility (22.57%) compared to ALGT (14.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALGT dropped -86.01% vs ULCC's -87.04%.

ALGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALGT and ULCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer