ALGT vs. ULCC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC).

Performance

ALGT vs. ULCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALGT vs. ULCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ALGT Allegiant Travel Company	-4.96%	-9.40%	16.03%	23.44%	-63.65%	-23.58%
ULCC Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.	-25.05%	-33.76%	30.22%	-46.84%	-24.32%	-28.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALGT : $1.47B ULCC : $811.79M
EPS ALGT : -$2.47 ULCC : -$0.60
PS Ratio ALGT : 0.56 ULCC : 0.22
PB Ratio ALGT : 1.40K ULCC : 1.87
Total Revenue (TTM) ALGT : $2.61B ULCC : $3.72B
Gross Profit (TTM) ALGT : $1.07B ULCC : $1.32B
EBITDA (TTM) ALGT : $329.79M ULCC : -$38.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALGT achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly higher than ULCC's -25.05% return.

ALGT

• 1D: 5.85%
• 1M: -20.67%
• YTD: -4.96%
• 6M: 33.36%
• 1Y: 56.90%
• 3Y*: -3.04%
• 5Y*: -19.29%
• 10Y*: -6.38%

ULCC

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: -20.50%
• YTD: -25.05%
• 6M: -20.05%
• 1Y: -18.66%
• 3Y*: -28.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALGT vs. ULCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALGT

ALGT Risk / Return Rank: 71
ALGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ALGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ALGT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ALGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ALGT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ULCC

ULCC Risk / Return Rank: 29
ULCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
ULCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ULCC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ULCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
ULCC Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALGT vs. ULCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALGT	ULCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	-0.22	+1.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	0.26	+1.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.03	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	-0.50	+2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	-1.21	+5.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALGT vs. ULCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the ULCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALGT and ULCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALGT	ULCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	-0.22	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	-0.42	+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between ALGT and ULCC is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALGT vs. ULCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALGT nor ULCC has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALGT Allegiant Travel Company	0.00%	0.00%	1.27%	1.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	1.61%	2.79%	1.81%	1.44%	1.64%
ULCC Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ALGT vs. ULCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALGT drawdown since its inception was -86.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ULCC drawdown of -87.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALGT and ULCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALGT	ULCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.01%	-87.04%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.96%	-52.45%	+17.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.81%	-83.89%	+15.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.32%	-59.66%	+28.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.28%	21.96%	-9.68%

Volatility

ALGT vs. ULCC - Volatility Comparison

Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) has a higher volatility of 20.15% compared to Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) at 18.74%. This indicates that ALGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALGT	ULCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.15%	18.74%	+1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.18%	51.55%	-6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.44%	84.94%	-16.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.56%	68.01%	-14.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.62%	68.01%	-17.39%

Financials

ALGT vs. ULCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allegiant Travel Company and Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ALGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a gross profit of 426.31M and revenue of 656.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.

ULCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 464.00M and revenue of 997.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

ALGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported an operating income of 66.84M and revenue of 656.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

ULCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.00M and revenue of 997.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

ALGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a net income of 31.94M and revenue of 656.19M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

ULCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 53.00M and revenue of 997.00M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.