PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALGT vs. CVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALGT vs. CVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALGT achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly higher than CVX's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ALGT has underperformed CVX with an annualized return of -2.03%, while CVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.


ALGT

1D
1.33%
1M
28.93%
YTD
21.43%
6M
24.37%
1Y
100.78%
3Y*
-3.48%
5Y*
-11.52%
10Y*
-2.03%

CVX

1D
0.53%
1M
-8.07%
YTD
17.66%
6M
19.15%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
15.06%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALGT vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
21.43%-9.40%16.03%23.44%-63.65%-1.16%9.32%76.98%-33.95%-5.16%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
17.66%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ALGT and CVX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2006

0.20

The correlation between ALGT and CVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALGT:

$1.89B

CVX:

$349.48B

EPS

ALGT:

-$1.89

CVX:

$5.75

PS Ratio

ALGT:

0.71

CVX:

1.81

PB Ratio

ALGT:

1.72K

CVX:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALGT:

$2.64B

CVX:

$185.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALGT:

$815.04M

CVX:

$47.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALGT:

$340.03M

CVX:

$40.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALGT vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALGT
ALGT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ALGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ALGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALGT vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALGTCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.47

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

4.06

+1.93

ALGT vs. CVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the CVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALGT and CVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALGT vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALGT drawdown since its inception was -86.01%, which is greater than CVX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALGT and CVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALGTCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.01%

-55.77%

-30.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.13%

-17.02%

-22.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.95%

-20.64%

-50.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.93%

-24.95%

-56.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.01%

-55.77%

-30.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.15%

-15.89%

-44.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.74%

-11.39%

-20.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.87%

6.14%

+10.73%

Volatility

ALGT vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison

Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) has a higher volatility of 18.66% compared to Chevron Corporation (CVX) at 7.25%. This indicates that ALGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALGTCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.66%

7.25%

+11.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.21%

18.24%

+26.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.29%

22.47%

+42.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.02%

25.12%

+29.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.48%

29.19%

+22.29%

Dividends

ALGT vs. CVX - Dividend Comparison

ALGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
0.00%0.00%1.27%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.61%2.79%1.81%1.44%1.64%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.97%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%

Financials

ALGT vs. CVX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegiant Travel Company and Chevron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
732.43M
47.56B
(ALGT) Total Revenue
(CVX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALGT vs. CVX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allegiant Travel Company and Chevron Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
65.4%
9.6%
Portfolio components
ALGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a gross profit of 479.13M and revenue of 732.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.

CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

ALGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported an operating income of 81.10M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

ALGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a net income of 42.48M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALGT and CVX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALGT has higher volatility (18.66%) compared to CVX (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALGT dropped -86.01% vs CVX's -55.77%.

ALGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALGT and CVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer