PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALGN vs. SLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALGN vs. SLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALGN achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 48.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ALGN has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 8.27%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.34% annualized return.


ALGN

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.09%
YTD
11.97%
6M
5.69%
1Y
-3.77%
3Y*
-18.42%
5Y*
-22.15%
10Y*
8.27%

SLB

1D
0.32%
1M
1.98%
YTD
48.01%
6M
44.00%
1Y
61.98%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
-0.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALGN vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALGN
Align Technology, Inc.
11.97%-25.11%-23.90%29.92%-67.91%22.98%91.51%33.24%-5.74%131.13%
SLB
Schlumberger Limited
48.01%3.27%-24.47%-0.78%81.15%40.30%-43.81%17.73%-44.66%-17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ALGN and SLB is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2001

0.25

Fundamentals

EPS

ALGN:

$5.96

SLB:

$3.04

PE Ratio

ALGN:

29.32

SLB:

18.45

PS Ratio

ALGN:

3.08

SLB:

1.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALGN:

$4.10B

SLB:

$35.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALGN:

$2.77B

SLB:

$4.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALGN:

$776.15M

SLB:

$5.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALGN vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALGN
ALGN Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ALGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALGN Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ALGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALGN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SLB
SLB Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALGN vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALGNSLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.31

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

4.36

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

10.97

-11.13

ALGN vs. SLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALGN Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the SLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALGN and SLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALGN vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALGN drawdown since its inception was -92.83%, which is greater than SLB's maximum drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALGN and SLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALGNSLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.83%

-87.64%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.73%

-14.30%

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.59%

-46.63%

-20.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.89%

-46.63%

-36.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.89%

-84.29%

+1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.05%

-33.53%

-42.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.96%

-31.18%

-6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.97%

5.67%

+18.30%

Volatility

ALGN vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison

Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Schlumberger Limited (SLB) at 9.50%. This indicates that ALGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALGNSLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.05%

9.50%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.02%

25.72%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.95%

33.73%

+19.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.58%

37.63%

+11.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.08%

40.41%

+8.67%

Dividends

ALGN vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison

ALGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALGN
Align Technology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLB
Schlumberger Limited
2.06%2.97%2.87%1.92%1.22%2.09%4.01%4.98%5.54%2.97%2.38%2.87%

Financials

ALGN vs. SLB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Align Technology, Inc. and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
1.04B
8.72B
(ALGN) Total Revenue
(SLB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALGN vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Align Technology, Inc. and Schlumberger Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
70.8%
0
Portfolio components
ALGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Align Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 736.59M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.8%.

SLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ALGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Align Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.96M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

SLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ALGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Align Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 112.77M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

SLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALGN and SLB have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALGN has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to SLB (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALGN dropped -92.83% vs SLB's -87.64%.

SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALGN and SLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer