PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALB vs. EVSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALB vs. EVSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -8.32% return, which is significantly lower than EVSD's 1.07% return.


ALB

1D
-3.57%
1M
-16.79%
6M
-18.01%
YTD
-8.32%
1Y
99.64%
3Y*
-17.15%
5Y*
-4.00%
10Y*
5.84%

EVSD

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.45%
6M
0.95%
YTD
1.07%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALB vs. EVSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
-8.32%67.72%-16.13%
EVSD
Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF
1.07%6.80%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ALB and EVSD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALB vs. EVSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALB
ALB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EVSD
EVSD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EVSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALB vs. EVSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALBEVSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.58

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.46

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

14.44

-6.82

ALB vs. EVSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALB Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the EVSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALB and EVSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALB vs. EVSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, which is greater than EVSD's maximum drawdown of -1.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and EVSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALBEVSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.90%

-1.26%

-82.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.01%

-1.26%

-38.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.26%

-0.14%

-58.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

-0.19%

-20.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.13%

0.30%

+12.83%

Volatility

ALB vs. EVSD - Volatility Comparison

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 17.44% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) at 0.58%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALBEVSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.44%

0.58%

+16.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.53%

1.24%

+42.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.48%

1.57%

+60.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.87%

1.94%

+52.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.40%

1.94%

+46.46%

Dividends

ALB vs. EVSD - Dividend Comparison

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than EVSD's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.26%1.15%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.01%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%
EVSD
Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF
4.63%4.64%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALB and EVSD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALB has higher volatility (17.44%) compared to EVSD (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALB dropped -83.90% vs EVSD's -1.26%.

EVSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALB and EVSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer