PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIYY vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIYY vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIYY vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
-33.80%-58.98%-14.74%-1.63%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%6.11%-2.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIYY achieves a -33.80% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.


AIYY

1D
0.70%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-33.80%
6M
-47.29%
1Y
-59.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIYY vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AIYY vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIYY
AIYY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AIYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIYY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
AIYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIYY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIYY vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIYYXOMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.07

1.02

-2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.66

1.40

-3.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.20

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

1.47

-2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.49

3.35

-4.85

AIYY vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIYY Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIYY and XOMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIYYXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.07

1.02

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.93

0.55

-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between AIYY and XOMO is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AIYY vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

AIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 204.65%, more than XOMO's 30.57% yield.


TTM202520242023
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
204.65%168.33%98.26%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Drawdowns

AIYY vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIYY drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIYY and XOMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AIYYXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.48%

-18.90%

-60.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.33%

-15.24%

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.38%

-5.12%

-73.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.37%

-7.05%

-31.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.39%

6.69%

+32.70%

Volatility

AIYY vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) at 6.57%. This indicates that AIYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AIYYXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

6.57%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.00%

13.81%

+24.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.58%

22.02%

+33.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.56%

18.46%

+32.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.56%

18.46%

+32.10%