AIYY vs. QRMI
AIYY (YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF) and QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QRMI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AIYY returned -57.47% vs 9.73% for QRMI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QRMI.
Performance
AIYY vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIYY achieves a -24.26% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's 2.60% return.
AIYY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- -24.26%
- 6M
- -29.50%
- 1Y
- -57.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRMI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 9.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIYY vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.26% | -58.98% | -14.74% | -1.63% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 2.60% | 3.76% | 14.72% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIYY and QRMI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIYY vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank
AIYY
QRMI
AIYY vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIYY | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | 1.71 | -2.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | 2.30 | -3.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.35 | -0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 1.94 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 8.52 | -9.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIYY | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.07 | 1.71 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | 0.22 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
AIYY vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIYY drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIYY and QRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIYY | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.48% | -20.95% | -58.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.33% | -5.04% | -63.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.26% | 0.00% | -75.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -7.98% | -33.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.63% | 1.14% | +46.49% |
Volatility
AIYY vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 0.66%. This indicates that AIYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIYY | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.67% | 0.66% | +15.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.16% | 4.43% | +34.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.83% | 5.76% | +48.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.52% | 8.34% | +42.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.52% | 8.34% | +42.18% |
AIYY vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIYY vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison
AIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 158.78%, more than QRMI's 12.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | 158.78% | 168.33% | 98.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.19% | 12.28% | 11.80% | 12.44% | 10.65% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIYY and QRMI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIYY has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to QRMI (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIYY dropped -79.48% vs QRMI's -20.95%.
On 1-year performance, QRMI leads with 9.73% vs -57.47% for AIYY. On fees, QRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QRMI has performed better with a 9.73% return vs -57.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AIYY.
AIYY has the higher dividend yield at 158.78%, compared with 12.19% for QRMI.
AIYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QRMI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AIYY and 0.60% for QRMI.
QRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIYY and QRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer