AIVL vs. TMDV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AIVL (WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund) and TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. AIVL is actively managed, while TMDV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIVL returned 7.05%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for TMDV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIVL charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TMDV.

Performance

AIVL vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 5.35% return.

AIVL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 8.24%

TMDV

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 5.35%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: 5.43%
• 5Y*: 2.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIVL WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund	10.60%	9.72%	13.49%	7.17%	-7.26%	24.30%	-5.82%	3.21%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	5.35%	2.91%	2.64%	2.25%	-5.10%	23.45%	4.82%	3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and TMDV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019	0.90

The correlation between AIVL and TMDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVL vs. TMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIVL	TMDV
Financial Services	18.2%	16.0%
Technology	17.9%	1.5%
Industrials	15.8%	15.9%
Healthcare	13.2%	5.6%
Utilities	9.3%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.9%	23.8%
Basic Materials	5.7%	11.7%
Communication Services	4.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	5.8%
Energy	2.4%	3.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	4.6%

Return for Risk

AIVL vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL

AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 45
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 51

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 19
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIVL	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	0.62	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.00	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.11	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	0.76	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	1.86	+6.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIVL vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and TMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIVL	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	0.62	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.18	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.31	+0.11

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and TMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIVL	TMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.48%	-33.42%	-29.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.85%	-9.82%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.48%	-16.02%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.08%	-17.11%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-5.82%	+5.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-5.43%	-2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	4.00%	-2.06%

Volatility

AIVL vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIVL	TMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	2.91%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	8.55%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.19%	12.11%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.72%	14.43%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	18.64%	-1.30%

AIVL vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIVL vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than TMDV's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIVL WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund	1.45%	1.61%	2.13%	2.43%	2.08%	2.75%	3.55%	3.25%	4.18%	3.16%	3.20%	3.41%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.60%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIVL and TMDV in my portfolio?

AIVL and TMDV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIVL or TMDV?

AIVL has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to TMDV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs TMDV's -33.42%.

Which ETF is better, AIVL or TMDV?

On 5-year performance, AIVL leads with 7.05% vs 2.57% for TMDV. On fees, TMDV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIVL or TMDV?

Over the 5-year period, AIVL has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIVL or TMDV?

TMDV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIVL or TMDV?

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.45% for AIVL.

What is the main difference between AIVL and TMDV?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.35% for TMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.