PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVL has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.53%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


AIVL

1D
-0.91%
1M
2.64%
YTD
12.13%
6M
11.55%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
8.53%

SCHG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.09%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
12.13%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%13.77%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
1.35%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and SCHG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between AIVL and SCHG has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AIVL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
SCHG

Technology

21.3%
46.7%

Financial Services

17.9%
6.6%

Industrials

15.5%
6.0%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.4%

Utilities

8.9%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
1.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
12.4%

Energy

3.1%
0.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.5%

Technology

AIVL
21.3%
SCHG
46.7%

Financial Services

AIVL
17.9%
SCHG
6.6%

Industrials

AIVL
15.5%
SCHG
6.0%

Healthcare

AIVL
12.0%
SCHG
8.4%

Utilities

AIVL
8.9%
SCHG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
7.8%
SCHG
1.6%

Basic Materials

AIVL
4.6%
SCHG
1.3%

Communication Services

AIVL
4.2%
SCHG
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.1%
SCHG
12.4%

Energy

AIVL
3.1%
SCHG
0.7%

Real Estate

AIVL
1.5%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVLSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.10

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

3.58

+5.19

AIVL vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-34.59%

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-16.41%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-23.39%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-34.59%

+15.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-34.59%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-6.46%

+5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-5.20%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

5.02%

-3.07%

Volatility

AIVL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) is 4.03%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that AIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

5.91%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

12.52%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

16.24%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

22.38%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

21.58%

-4.23%

AIVL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.43%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and SCHG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to AIVL (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 8.53% for AIVL. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, AIVL has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

AIVL has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

AIVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.04% for SCHG.

AIVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer